Which paid more, FBYY or METW?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FBYY paid 27.3% of its starting price in cash and METW paid 30.8%, so METW paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, FBYY or METW?

With every distribution reinvested, FBYY returned −34.6% and METW −4.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, FBYY or METW?

FBYY charges 1.17% a year and METW charges 1.00%, so METW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

FBYY vs METW: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, METW paid 30.8% of its price in cash against FBYY’s 27.3%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBYY and METW

Net assets: $296,245 on Nov 3, 2026 for GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF, and $23m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF.

FBYY on its own →METW on its own →

At a glance

27.3%

FBYY cash paid, 1 year

30.8%

METW cash paid, 1 year

−34.6%

FBYY total return, 1 year

−4.5%

METW total return, 1 year

FBYY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 35.4 pts behind META

FBYY

−34.6%

META

+0.8%

35.4 pts behind META

FBYY over 1 year: paid 27.3%, price −56.6%, total −34.6%, META +0.8%, −35.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

META

+0.8%

FBYY

−34.6%

35.4 pts behind META

Total return, distributions reinvested

35.4 pts behind META

FBYY over 1 year: paid 27.3%, price −56.6%, total −34.6%, META +0.8%, −35.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

META

+0.8%

FBYY

−34.6%

35.4 pts behind META

27.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. FBYY over 1 year: paid 27.3%, price −56.6%, total −34.6%, META +0.8%, −35.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

METW · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 5.3 pts behind META

METW

−4.5%

META

+0.8%

5.3 pts behind META

METW over 1 year: paid 30.8%, price −34.0%, total −4.5%, META +0.8%, −5.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

META

+0.8%

METW

−4.5%

5.3 pts behind META

Total return, distributions reinvested

5.3 pts behind META

METW over 1 year: paid 30.8%, price −34.0%, total −4.5%, META +0.8%, −5.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

META

+0.8%

METW

−4.5%

5.3 pts behind META

30.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. METW over 1 year: paid 30.8%, price −34.0%, total −4.5%, META +0.8%, −5.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

METW costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 30.1 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FBYY vs METW: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	FBYY	METW
Paid and earned
Measure	FBYY	METW
Total return, 1 year	−34.6%	−4.5%
Price change, 1 year	fell 56.6%	fell 34.0%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	84% of the Sep 22, 2026 payment	100% of the Nov 3, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	FBYY	METW
Benchmark	Meta Platforms (META)	Meta Platforms (META)
Cost and size
Measure	FBYY	METW
Expense ratio	1.17%	1.00%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$296,245	$23m
Holdings
Measure	FBYY	METW
Holdings in common	0%

ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · METW scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

IQ Income Score14.9FBYY56.5METW

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 77 income ETFs writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

FBYY 14.9

METW 56.5

0.6, the lowest in this set 99.4, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, FBYY and METW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBYY METW

Only in one fund ↓

Only in FBYY

Only in METW

Meta Platforms Inc 23.81%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF · Synthetic covered call on META, paying weekly METW Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF · Option income on META, paying weekly

Issuer GraniteShares Roundhill

Strategy synthetic covered call option income

Benchmark Meta Platforms (META) Meta Platforms (META)

Pays weekly weekly

Payout rate, annualized 29.9% 13.7%

Expense ratio 1.17% 1.00%

Cash paid, 1 year 27.3% 30.8%

Price change, 1 year −56.6% −34.0%

Total return, 1 year −34.6% −4.5%

Benchmark return, 1 year +0.8% +0.8%

Ahead or behind −35.4 pts −5.3 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 84% 100%

Age 1.0 years 1.4 years

Net assets, FBYY as of Nov 3, 2026 and METW as of Nov 4, 2026 $296,245 $23m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: FBYY vs METW: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	FBYY	METW	FBYY	METW	FBYY	METW
3 months	−3.3%	+6.7%	7.2%	10.5%	−10.4 pts	−0.4 pts
6 months	−11.1%	+0.7%	14.1%	17.6%	−14.1 pts	−2.2 pts
1 year	−34.6%	−4.5%	27.3%	30.8%	−35.4 pts	−5.2 pts
Since launchNot the same days: FBYY Oct 2025 · METW Jun 2025	−38.8%	−17.2%	27.0%	40.1%	−25.0 pts	−8.1 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

FBYY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FBYY paid 27.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 56.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −34.6%. Meta Platforms (META) returned +0.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 35.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.9%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 84% of the distribution paid Sep 22, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

METW

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, METW paid 30.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 34.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −4.5%. Meta Platforms (META) returned +0.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.7%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 3, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FBYY or METW?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FBYY paid 27.3% of its starting price in cash and METW paid 30.8%, so METW paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FBYY or METW?: With every distribution reinvested, FBYY returned −34.6% and METW −4.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, FBYY or METW?: FBYY charges 1.17% a year and METW charges 1.00%, so METW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

FBYY vs MEIB FBYY vs XVMT FBYY vs FBY METW vs XVMT METW vs MEIB METW vs FBY

Where to next

FBYY on its own →METW on its own →FBYY dividend history →METW dividend history →METW holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

FBYY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

FBYY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

FBYY 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

GraniteShares page for FBYY ↗

METW filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

METW prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

METW 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Roundhill page for METW ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBYY against METW, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fbyy-vs-metw

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.