Data as of .
FBYY vs METW: which paid, and which earned it?
FBYY and METW both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FBYY and METW hold 50% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FBYY | METW |
|---|---|---|
| Treasury Bill | 50.24% | 76.97% |
| Only in FBYY | Only in METW |
|---|---|
| Treasury Bill 49.76% | Meta Platforms Inc 23.03% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBYY | METW | FBYY | METW | FBYY | METW | |
| 3 months | −6.1% | +16.6% | 6.8% | 9.9% | −21.5 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | −11.0% | +11.1% | 15.7% | 17.2% | −23.2 pts | −1.1 pts |
| 1 year | not published | −21.5% | not published | 25.4% | not published | −7.1 pts |
| Since launch | −36.0% | −11.0% | 25.6% | 37.2% | −27.1 pts | −7.0 pts |
| FBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF Synthetic covered call on META, paying weekly | METW Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF Option income on META, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | GraniteShares | Roundhill |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | (META) | (META) |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 29.7% | 50.2% |
| Expense ratio | 1.07% | 1.00% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 25.6% (since launch on Oct 21, 2025) | 25.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | −56.9% | −46.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | −36.0% (since launch on Oct 21, 2025) | −21.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −9.0% | −14.4% |
| Ahead or behind | −27.1 pts | −7.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 92% | not published |
| Age | 332 days | 457 days |
| Net assets | $215,841 | $27m |
FBYY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Oct 21, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, FBYY paid 25.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 56.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −36.0%. (META) returned −9.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 27.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.7%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 92% of the distribution paid Aug 25, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
METW in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, METW paid 25.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 46.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −21.5%. (META) returned −14.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 50.2%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, FBYY or METW?
- FBYY charges 1.07% a year and METW charges 1.00%, so METW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBYY against METW, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fbyy-vs-metw Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.