Which paid more, FBY or FBYY?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FBY paid 34.1% of its starting price in cash and FBYY paid 27.3%, so FBY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, FBY or FBYY?

With every distribution reinvested, FBY returned −5.8% and FBYY −34.6% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, FBY or FBYY?

FBY charges 1.06% a year and FBYY charges 1.17%, so FBY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

FBY vs FBYY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FBY paid 34.1% of its price in cash against FBYY’s 27.3%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FBY and FBYY

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $98m for YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF and $296,245 for GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF.

FBY on its own →FBYY on its own →

At a glance

34.1%

FBY cash paid, 1 year

27.3%

FBYY cash paid, 1 year

−5.8%

FBY total return, 1 year

−34.6%

FBYY total return, 1 year

FBY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 6.6 pts behind META

FBY

−5.8%

META

+0.8%

6.6 pts behind META

FBY over 1 year: paid 34.1%, price −38.4%, total −5.8%, META +0.8%, −6.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

META

+0.8%

FBY

−5.8%

6.6 pts behind META

Total return, distributions reinvested

6.6 pts behind META

FBY over 1 year: paid 34.1%, price −38.4%, total −5.8%, META +0.8%, −6.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

META

+0.8%

FBY

−5.8%

6.6 pts behind META

34.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. FBY over 1 year: paid 34.1%, price −38.4%, total −5.8%, META +0.8%, −6.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FBYY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 35.4 pts behind META

FBYY

−34.6%

META

+0.8%

35.4 pts behind META

FBYY over 1 year: paid 27.3%, price −56.6%, total −34.6%, META +0.8%, −35.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

META

+0.8%

FBYY

−34.6%

35.4 pts behind META

Total return, distributions reinvested

35.4 pts behind META

FBYY over 1 year: paid 27.3%, price −56.6%, total −34.6%, META +0.8%, −35.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

META

+0.8%

FBYY

−34.6%

35.4 pts behind META

27.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. FBYY over 1 year: paid 27.3%, price −56.6%, total −34.6%, META +0.8%, −35.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

FBY costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 28.8 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FBY vs FBYY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	FBY	FBYY
Paid and earned
Measure	FBY	FBYY
Total return, 1 year	−5.8%	−34.6%
Price change, 1 year	fell 38.4%	fell 56.6%
Return of capital, issuer estimate		84% of the Sep 22, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	FBY	FBYY
Benchmark	Meta Platforms (META)	Meta Platforms (META)
Cost and size
Measure	FBY	FBYY
Expense ratio	1.06%	1.17%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026	$98m	$296,245
Holdings
Measure	FBY	FBYY
Holdings in common	0%

ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · FBY scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

IQ Income Score55.2FBY14.9FBYY

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 77 income ETFs writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

FBY 55.2

FBYY 14.9

0.6, the lowest in this set 99.4, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, FBY and FBYY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FBY FBYY

Only in one fund ↓

Only in FBY

United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 27.80%

United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 25.91%

META 12/18/2026 740.01 C 0.81%

META US 11/06/26 C647.5 0.13%

META US 11/06/26 C660 0.09%

META US 11/06/26 C665 0.02%

META US 11/06/26 C652.5 0.01%

META US 11/06/26 C632.5 -0.06%

Only in FBYY

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FBY YieldMax META Option Income Strategy ETF · Synthetic covered call on META, paying weekly FBYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST META ETF · Synthetic covered call on META, paying weekly

Issuer YieldMax GraniteShares

Strategy synthetic covered call synthetic covered call

Benchmark Meta Platforms (META) Meta Platforms (META)

Pays weekly weekly

Payout rate, annualized 33.3% 29.9%

Expense ratio 1.06% 1.17%

Cash paid, 1 year 34.1% 27.3%

Price change, 1 year −38.4% −56.6%

Total return, 1 year −5.8% −34.6%

Benchmark return, 1 year +0.8% +0.8%

Ahead or behind −6.6 pts −35.4 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published 84%

Age 3.3 years 1.0 years

Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $98m $296,245

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: FBY vs FBYY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	FBY	FBYY	FBY	FBYY	FBY	FBYY
3 months	+3.4%	−3.3%	11.4%	7.2%	−3.7 pts	−10.4 pts
6 months	−1.3%	−11.1%	19.7%	14.1%	−4.2 pts	−14.1 pts
1 year	−5.8%	−34.6%	34.1%	27.3%	−6.6 pts	−35.4 pts
3 years	+52.5%	–	108.5%	–	−49.6 pts	–
Since launchNot the same days: FBY Jul 2023 · FBYY Oct 2025	+54.9%	−38.8%	109.8%	27.0%	−40.5 pts	−25.0 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

FBY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FBY paid 34.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 38.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −5.8%. Meta Platforms (META) returned +0.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.6 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 33.3%, paid weekly.

FBYY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FBYY paid 27.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 56.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −34.6%. Meta Platforms (META) returned +0.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 35.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 29.9%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 84% of the distribution paid Sep 22, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FBY or FBYY?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FBY paid 34.1% of its starting price in cash and FBYY paid 27.3%, so FBY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FBY or FBYY?: With every distribution reinvested, FBY returned −5.8% and FBYY −34.6% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, FBY or FBYY?: FBY charges 1.06% a year and FBYY charges 1.17%, so FBY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

FBY vs MEIB FBY vs XVMT FBY vs METW FBYY vs METW FBYY vs XVMT FBYY vs MEIB

Where to next

FBY on its own →FBYY on its own →FBY dividend history →FBY holdings →FBYY dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

FBY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

FBY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

FBY 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

YieldMax page for FBY ↗

FBYY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

FBYY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

FBYY 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

GraniteShares page for FBYY ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FBY against FBYY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fby-vs-fbyy

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.