Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FBY vs MEIB: which paid, and which earned it?

FBY and MEIB both write options for income.

YieldMax(R) META Option Income Strategy ETF and Direxion META Defined Income Boost ETF.

28.0%FBY cash paid, 1 year
2.4%MEIB cash paid, 1 year
−17.1%FBY total return, 1 year
+14.5%MEIB total return, 1 year
FBY2.7 pts behind META · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
META−14.4%FBY−17.1%2.7 pts behind METATotal return, distributions reinvestedMETA−14.4%FBY−17.1%2.7 pts behind META
MEIB0.8 pts ahead of META · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
META+13.7%MEIB+14.5%0.8 pts ahead of METATotal return, distributions reinvestedMETA+13.7%MEIB+14.5%0.8 pts ahead of META

Performance, window by window

FBY and MEIB over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FBYMEIBFBYMEIBFBYMEIB
3 months+8.5%not published10.0%not published−6.9 ptsnot published
6 months+4.1%not published18.7%not published−8.2 ptsnot published
1 year−17.1%not published28.0%not published−2.7 ptsnot published
3 years+68.1%not published110.8%not published−52.0 ptsnot published
Since launch+62.6%+14.5%107.0%2.4%−43.7 pts+0.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FBY and MEIB on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FBY
YieldMax(R) META Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on META, paying weekly
MEIB
Direxion META Defined Income Boost ETF
Option income on META, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxDirexion
Strategysynthetic covered calloption income
Benchmark(META)(META)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized40.9%9.8%
Expense ratio1.06%0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year28.0%2.4% (since launch on Jul 29, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−44.9%+11.9%
Total return, 1 year−17.1%+14.5% (since launch on Jul 29, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year−14.4%+13.7%
Ahead or behind−2.7 pts+0.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate95%not published
Age1148 days51 days
Net assets$115m$2m

FBY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FBY paid 28.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 44.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −17.1%. (META) returned −14.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 40.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

MEIB in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jul 29, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, MEIB paid 2.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 11.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.5%. (META) returned +13.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.8%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, FBY or MEIB?
FBY charges 1.06% a year and MEIB charges 0.97%, so MEIB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FBY against MEIB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FBY against MEIB, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fby-vs-meib Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources