Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
LQDW vs TLTI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LQDW paid 11.3% of its price in cash against TLTI’s 5.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about LQDW and TLTI
Net assets: $348m on Nov 3, 2026 for iShares LQD Premium Income+ ETF, and $21m on Oct 28, 2026 for NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
3.5 pts ahead of LQD
LQDW over 1 year: paid 11.3%, price −9.0%, total +2.4%, LQD −1.1%, +3.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
LQD
−1.1%
LQDW
+2.4%
11.3% of it arrived as cash
3.5 pts ahead of LQD
Total return, distributions reinvested
3.5 pts ahead of LQD
LQDW over 1 year: paid 11.3%, price −9.0%, total +2.4%, LQD −1.1%, +3.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
LQD
−1.1%
LQDW
+2.4%
3.5 pts ahead of LQD
11.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. LQDW over 1 year: paid 11.3%, price −9.0%, total +2.4%, LQD −1.1%, +3.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.1.7 pts ahead of TLT
TLTI over 1 year: paid 5.8%, price −8.8%, total −3.1%, TLT −4.8%, +1.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
TLT
−4.8%
TLTI
−3.1%
1.7 pts ahead of TLT
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.7 pts ahead of TLT
TLTI over 1 year: paid 5.8%, price −8.8%, total −3.1%, TLT −4.8%, +1.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
TLT
−4.8%
TLTI
−3.1%
1.7 pts ahead of TLT
5.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. TLTI over 1 year: paid 5.8%, price −8.8%, total −3.1%, TLT −4.8%, +1.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
LQDW costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.5 points; LQDW is 16.8 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | LQDW | TLTI |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +2.4% | −3.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 9.0% | fell 8.8% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 64% of the Oct 7, 2026 payment | 19% of the Oct 16, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | US investment grade bonds, measured through LQD | 20+ Year Treasury, measured through TLT |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.34% | 0.58% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 28, 2026 | $353m | $21m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, LQDW and TLTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | LQDW | TLTI | LQDW | TLTI | LQDW | TLTI |
| 3 months | +0.3% | −0.1% | 3.6% | 1.5% | +1.2 pts | +0.2 pts |
| 6 months | +0.4% | −2.2% | 5.9% | 2.9% | +2.3 pts | +0.5 pts |
| 1 year | +2.4% | −3.1% | 11.3% | 5.8% | +3.5 pts | +1.7 pts |
| 3 years | +15.7% | – | 38.0% | – | −1.7 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: LQDW Aug 2022 · TLTI Dec 2024 | +10.2% | −1.5% | 48.1% | 11.0% | −3.2 pts | +1.9 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
LQDW
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LQDW paid 11.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.4%. US investment grade bonds (LQD) returned −1.1% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.5 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 16.5%, paid monthly. iShares estimates that 64% of the distribution paid Oct 7, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
TLTI
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, TLTI paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.1%. 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) returned −4.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.7 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 19% of the distribution paid Oct 16, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, LQDW against TLTI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lqdw-vs-tlti
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). LQDW against TLTI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lqdw-vs-tlti
[LQDW against TLTI (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lqdw-vs-tlti)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.