Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

LQDW vs LTTI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year LQDW paid 10.6% of its price in cash against LTTI’s 8.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.

iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF and FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF.

10.6%LQDW cash paid, 1 year
8.4%LTTI cash paid, 1 year
+1.8%LQDW total return, 1 year
−4.5%LTTI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: LQDW scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

LQDW 60LTTI 46.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

LQDW3.8 pts ahead of LQD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
LQD−2.0%LQDW+1.8%10.6% as cash3.8 pts ahead of LQDTotal return, distributions reinvestedLQD−2.0%LQDW+1.8%3.8 pts ahead of LQD
LTTIAbout even with TLT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
TLT−4.7%LTTI−4.5%about even with TLTTotal return, distributions reinvestedTLT−4.7%LTTI−4.5%about even with TLT

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LQDW and LTTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in LQDWOnly in LTTI
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.74%2026-10-30 iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF C 0.82 98.49%
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 0.19%US Dollar 0.85%
CVS HEALTH CORP 0.18%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 09/29/2026 0.38%
T-MOBILE USA INC 0.18%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.38%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.17%2026-09-25 iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF C 81.24 -0.10%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC/THE 0.15%
PFIZER INVESTMENT ENTERPRISES PTE 0.15%
AMAZON.COM INC 0.14%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

LQDW and LTTI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
LQDWLTTILQDWLTTILQDWLTTI
3 months−1.6%−3.8%2.3%2.2%+1.2 pts+1.4 pts
6 months+1.3%−2.8%5.0%4.4%+1.9 pts+0.3 pts
1 year+1.8%−4.5%10.6%8.4%+3.8 pts+0.2 pts
3 years+10.8%not published36.3%not published−4.1 ptsnot published
Since launch+8.7%−2.1%46.4%12.9%−4.0 pts−0.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
LQDW and LTTI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
LQDW
iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
Covered call on LQD, paying monthly
LTTI
FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF
Option income on TLT, paying monthly
IssueriSharesFirst Trust
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkUS investment grade bonds (LQD)20+ Year Treasury (TLT)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized8.1%9.3%
Expense ratio0.34%0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year10.6%8.4%
Price change, 1 year−8.8%−12.6%
Total return, 1 year+1.8%−4.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year−2.0%−4.7%
Ahead or behind+3.8 pts+0.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1488 days582 days
Net assets$318m$15m

LQDW in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LQDW paid 10.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. US investment grade bonds (LQD) returned −2.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.1%, paid monthly.

LTTI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LTTI paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −4.5%. 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) returned −4.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, LQDW or LTTI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LQDW paid 10.6% of its starting price in cash and LTTI paid 8.4%, so LQDW paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, LQDW or LTTI?
With every distribution reinvested, LQDW returned +1.8% and LTTI returned −4.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so LQDW returned more.
Which is cheaper, LQDW or LTTI?
LQDW charges 0.34% a year and LTTI charges 0.65%, so LQDW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQDW against LTTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQDW against LTTI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lqdw-vs-ltti Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources