Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

LQTI vs LTTI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year LQTI paid 8.5% of its price in cash against LTTI’s 8.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.

FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF and FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF.

8.5%LQTI cash paid, 1 year
8.4%LTTI cash paid, 1 year
−1.4%LQTI total return, 1 year
−4.5%LTTI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: LQTI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

LQTI 50.6LTTI 46.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

LQTI0.6 pts ahead of LQD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
LQD−2.0%LQTI−1.4%0.6 pts ahead of LQDTotal return, distributions reinvestedLQD−2.0%LQTI−1.4%0.6 pts ahead of LQD
LTTIAbout even with TLT · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
TLT−4.7%LTTI−4.5%about even with TLTTotal return, distributions reinvestedTLT−4.7%LTTI−4.5%about even with TLT

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LQTI and LTTI hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions LQTI and LTTI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingLQTILTTI
US Dollar0.83%0.85%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 09/29/20260.43%0.38%
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/20260.43%0.38%
Only in each
Only in LQTIOnly in LTTI
2026-10-30 iShares iBoxx $ Investment Gr 98.40%2026-10-30 iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bon 98.49%
2026-09-25 iShares iBoxx $ Investment Gr -0.09%2026-09-25 iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bon -0.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

LQTI and LTTI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
LQTILTTILQTILTTILQTILTTI
3 months−2.5%−3.8%2.2%2.2%+0.4 pts+1.4 pts
6 months−0.2%−2.8%4.4%4.4%+0.3 pts+0.3 pts
1 year−1.4%−4.5%8.5%8.4%+0.6 pts+0.2 pts
Since launch+4.7%−2.1%13.4%12.9%+0.1 pts−0.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
LQTI and LTTI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
LQTI
FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF
Option income on LQD, paying monthly
LTTI
FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF
Option income on TLT, paying monthly
IssuerFirst TrustFirst Trust
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkUS investment grade bonds (LQD), used as the proxy20+ Year Treasury (TLT)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized9.2%9.3%
Expense ratio0.65%0.65%
Cash paid, 1 year8.5%8.4%
Price change, 1 year−9.7%−12.6%
Total return, 1 year−1.4%−4.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year−2.0%−4.7%
Ahead or behind+0.6 pts+0.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age582 days582 days
Net assets$242m$15m

LQTI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LQTI paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.4%. US investment grade bonds (LQD), used as the proxy returned −2.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.2%, paid monthly.

LTTI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LTTI paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −4.5%. 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) returned −4.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, LQTI or LTTI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LQTI paid 8.5% of its starting price in cash and LTTI paid 8.4%, so LQTI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, LQTI or LTTI?
With every distribution reinvested, LQTI returned −1.4% and LTTI returned −4.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so LQTI returned more.
Which is cheaper, LQTI or LTTI?
LQTI charges 0.65% a year and LTTI charges 0.65%, so LQTI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

LQTI against LTTI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, LQTI against LTTI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lqti-vs-ltti Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources