Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
LQDM vs TLTI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
LQDM and TLTI both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about LQDM and TLTI
Net assets: $4.1m on Nov 3, 2026 for Amplify LQD Investment Grade 12% Target Income ETF, and $21m on Oct 28, 2026 for NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF.
0.6 pts ahead of LQD
LQDM since launch: paid 5.8%, price −7.2%, total −1.4%, LQD −2.0%, +0.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
LQD
−2.0%
LQDM
−1.4%
0.6 pts ahead of LQD
Total return, distributions reinvested
0.6 pts ahead of LQD
LQDM since launch: paid 5.8%, price −7.2%, total −1.4%, LQD −2.0%, +0.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
LQD
−2.0%
LQDM
−1.4%
0.6 pts ahead of LQD
5.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. LQDM since launch: paid 5.8%, price −7.2%, total −1.4%, LQD −2.0%, +0.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.1.7 pts ahead of TLT
TLTI over 1 year: paid 5.8%, price −8.8%, total −3.1%, TLT −4.8%, +1.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
TLT
−4.8%
TLTI
−3.1%
1.7 pts ahead of TLT
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.7 pts ahead of TLT
TLTI over 1 year: paid 5.8%, price −8.8%, total −3.1%, TLT −4.8%, +1.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
TLT
−4.8%
TLTI
−3.1%
1.7 pts ahead of TLT
5.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. TLTI over 1 year: paid 5.8%, price −8.8%, total −3.1%, TLT −4.8%, +1.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
LQDM costs 0.04 points a year less; TLTI is 5.0 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | LQDM | TLTI |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | −3.1% |
| Price change | fell 7.2% (since Apr 21, 2026) | fell 8.8% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 65% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment | 19% of the Oct 16, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | US investment grade bonds, measured through LQD | 20+ Year Treasury, measured through TLT |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.58% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 28, 2026 | $4.2m | $21m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, LQDM and TLTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | LQDM | TLTI | LQDM | TLTI | LQDM | TLTI |
| 3 months | −0.5% | −0.1% | 2.9% | 1.5% | +0.4 pts | +0.2 pts |
| 6 months | −1.4% | −2.2% | 5.8% | 2.9% | +0.6 pts | +0.5 pts |
| 1 year | – | −3.1% | – | 5.8% | – | +1.7 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: LQDM Apr 2026 · TLTI Dec 2024 | −1.4% | −1.5% | 5.8% | 11.0% | +0.6 pts | +1.9 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
LQDM
Over the period from its first trade on Apr 21, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, LQDM paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.4%. US investment grade bonds (LQD) returned −2.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.1%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 65% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
TLTI
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, TLTI paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.1%. 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) returned −4.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.7 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 19% of the distribution paid Oct 16, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, LQDM against TLTI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lqdm-vs-tlti
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). LQDM against TLTI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lqdm-vs-tlti
[LQDM against TLTI (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lqdm-vs-tlti)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.