Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
LQDM vs LQTI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
LQDM and LQTI both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about LQDM and LQTI
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $4.1m for Amplify LQD Investment Grade 12% Target Income ETF and $185m for FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF.
0.6 pts ahead of LQD
LQDM since launch: paid 5.8%, price −7.2%, total −1.4%, LQD −2.0%, +0.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
LQD
−2.0%
LQDM
−1.4%
0.6 pts ahead of LQD
Total return, distributions reinvested
0.6 pts ahead of LQD
LQDM since launch: paid 5.8%, price −7.2%, total −1.4%, LQD −2.0%, +0.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
LQD
−2.0%
LQDM
−1.4%
0.6 pts ahead of LQD
5.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. LQDM since launch: paid 5.8%, price −7.2%, total −1.4%, LQD −2.0%, +0.6 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.About even with LQD
LQTI over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price −9.1%, total −0.6%, LQD −1.1%, +0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
LQD
−1.1%
LQTI
−0.6%
about even with LQD
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with LQD
LQTI over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price −9.1%, total −0.6%, LQD −1.1%, +0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
LQD
−1.1%
LQTI
−0.6%
about even with LQD
8.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. LQTI over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price −9.1%, total −0.6%, LQD −1.1%, +0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
LQDM costs 0.11 points a year less; LQTI is far larger, $185m against $4.1m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | LQDM | LQTI |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | −0.6% |
| Price change | fell 7.2% (since Apr 21, 2026) | fell 9.1% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 65% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment | 100% of the Nov 3, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | US investment grade bonds, measured through LQD | US investment grade bonds, measured through LQD |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $4.1m | $185m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Risk and return
May 1, 2026 to Oct 30, 2026 · 26 weekly returnsFrom May 2026 to Oct 2026, LQDM returned more: −1.5% to −1.8%. LQDM fell slightly less at its worst: −4.4% to −4.6%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | LQDM | LQTI | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | −1.5% | −1.8% | LQDM | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | −7.2% | −5.4% | LQTI | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −4.4% | −4.6% | LQDM (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 26 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, LQDM and LQTI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | LQDM | LQTI | LQDM | LQTI | LQDM | LQTI |
| 3 months | −0.5% | −0.4% | 2.9% | 2.2% | +0.4 pts | +0.4 pts |
| 6 months | −1.4% | −1.7% | 5.8% | 4.4% | +0.6 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 1 year | – | −0.6% | – | 8.6% | – | +0.5 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: LQDM Apr 2026 · LQTI Feb 2025 | −1.4% | +5.4% | 5.8% | 14.8% | +0.6 pts | +0.1 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for LQDM.
LQDM
Over the period from its first trade on Apr 21, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, LQDM paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.4%. US investment grade bonds (LQD) returned −2.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.1%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 65% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
LQTI
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, LQTI paid 8.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 9.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%. US investment grade bonds (LQD) returned −1.1% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.2%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 3, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, LQDM against LQTI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lqdm-vs-lqti
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). LQDM against LQTI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lqdm-vs-lqti
[LQDM against LQTI (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/lqdm-vs-lqti)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.