Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

KLIP vs OVF: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KLIP paid 18.9% of its price in cash against OVF’s 12.9%, though OVF returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about KLIP and OVF

Net assets: $85m on Nov 4, 2026 for KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF, and $61m on Aug 31, 2026 for Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF.

At a glance
18.9%
KLIP cash paid, 1 year
12.9%
OVF cash paid, 1 year
−14.9%
KLIP total return, 1 year
+18.2%
OVF total return, 1 year
KLIP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 19.1 pts ahead of KWEB
KLIP
−14.9%
KWEB
−34.0%

19.1 pts ahead of KWEB

KLIP over 1 year: paid 18.9%, price −32.7%, total −14.9%, KWEB −34.0%, +19.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

KWEB

−34.0%

KLIP

−14.9%

19.1 pts ahead of KWEB

Total return, distributions reinvested

19.1 pts ahead of KWEB

KLIP over 1 year: paid 18.9%, price −32.7%, total −14.9%, KWEB −34.0%, +19.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

KWEB

−34.0%

KLIP

−14.9%

19.1 pts ahead of KWEB

18.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. KLIP over 1 year: paid 18.9%, price −32.7%, total −14.9%, KWEB −34.0%, +19.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
OVF · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.3 pts ahead of ACWX
OVF
+18.2%
ACWX
+16.9%

1.3 pts ahead of ACWX

OVF over 1 year: paid 12.9%, price +4.6%, total +18.2%, ACWX +16.9%, +1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

ACWX

+16.9%

OVF

+18.2%

12.9% as cash

1.3 pts ahead of ACWX

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.3 pts ahead of ACWX

OVF over 1 year: paid 12.9%, price +4.6%, total +18.2%, ACWX +16.9%, +1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

ACWX

+16.9%

OVF

+18.2%

1.3 pts ahead of ACWX

12.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. OVF over 1 year: paid 12.9%, price +4.6%, total +18.2%, ACWX +16.9%, +1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

OVF costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 33.1 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

KLIP vs OVF: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureKLIPOVF
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year−14.9%+18.2%
Price change, 1 yearfell 32.7%rose 4.6%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Sep 30, 2026 payment100% of the Oct 29, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkChina internet, measured through KWEBiShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF, measured through ACWX
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.94%0.83%
Net assets, KLIP as of Nov 4, 2026 and OVF as of Aug 31, 2026$85m$61m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · OVF scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score5.7KLIP76.3OVF

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, KLIP and OVF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first KLIP OVF
Only in one fund ↓
Only in KLIP
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF 103.33%
2KWEB US 11/13/26 C24.93 -0.18%
2KWEB US 11/20/26 C24.41 -0.50%
2KWEB US 11/27/26 C23.14 -0.73%
2KWEB US 11/06/26 C23.86 -0.76%
2KWEB US 12/04/26 C22.74 -1.66%
Only in OVF
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF 74.92%
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Mar 25.12%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

KLIP KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF · Covered call on KWEB, paying monthly OVF Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF · Put-selling overlay on ACWX, paying monthly
Strategy covered call put-selling overlay
Benchmark China internet (KWEB) iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 23.5% 10.4%
Expense ratio 0.94% 0.83%
Cash paid, 1 year 18.9% 12.9%
Price change, 1 year −32.7% +4.6%
Total return, 1 year −14.9% +18.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year −34.0% +16.9%
Ahead or behind +19.1 pts +1.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 100% 100%
Age 3.8 years 7.1 years
Net assets, KLIP as of Nov 4, 2026 and OVF as of Aug 31, 2026 $85m $61m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: KLIP vs OVF: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowKLIPOVFKLIPOVFKLIPOVF
3 months−5.5%−3.1%5.6%2.5%+9.2 pts−0.2 pts
6 months−8.0%−1.0%10.6%5.1%+10.3 pts−0.3 pts
1 year−14.9%+18.2%18.9%12.9%+19.1 pts+1.2 pts
3 years+10.5%+76.6%67.0%29.1%+11.3 pts+6.0 pts
Since launchNot the same days: KLIP Jan 2023 · OVF Oct 2019+17.7%+80.6%81.2%41.9%+38.8 pts−17.2 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

KLIP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
KLIP

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KLIP paid 18.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 32.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −14.9%. China internet (KWEB) returned −34.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 19.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 23.5%, paid monthly. KraneShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

OVF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OVF paid 12.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.2%. iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) returned +16.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.4%, paid monthly. Overlay Shares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 29, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, KLIP or OVF?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KLIP paid 18.9% of its starting price in cash and OVF paid 12.9%, so KLIP paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, KLIP or OVF?
With every distribution reinvested, KLIP returned −14.9% and OVF +18.2% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, KLIP or OVF?
KLIP charges 0.94% a year and OVF charges 0.83%, so OVF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, KLIP against OVF, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/klip-vs-ovf

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.