Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

IDVO vs KLIP: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KLIP paid 18.9% of its price in cash against IDVO’s 6.7%, though IDVO returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about IDVO and KLIP

Net assets: $1.4bn on Nov 3, 2026 for Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF, and $85m on Nov 4, 2026 for KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF.

At a glance
6.7%
IDVO cash paid, 1 year
18.9%
KLIP cash paid, 1 year
+13.9%
IDVO total return, 1 year
−14.9%
KLIP total return, 1 year
IDVO · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3 pts behind ACWX
IDVO
+13.9%
ACWX
+16.9%

3 pts behind ACWX

IDVO over 1 year: paid 6.7%, price +7.3%, total +13.9%, ACWX +16.9%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

ACWX

+16.9%

IDVO

+13.9%

6.7% cash

3 pts behind ACWX

Total return, distributions reinvested

3 pts behind ACWX

IDVO over 1 year: paid 6.7%, price +7.3%, total +13.9%, ACWX +16.9%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

ACWX

+16.9%

IDVO

+13.9%

3 pts behind ACWX

6.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. IDVO over 1 year: paid 6.7%, price +7.3%, total +13.9%, ACWX +16.9%, −3.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
KLIP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 19.1 pts ahead of KWEB
KLIP
−14.9%
KWEB
−34.0%

19.1 pts ahead of KWEB

KLIP over 1 year: paid 18.9%, price −32.7%, total −14.9%, KWEB −34.0%, +19.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

KWEB

−34.0%

KLIP

−14.9%

19.1 pts ahead of KWEB

Total return, distributions reinvested

19.1 pts ahead of KWEB

KLIP over 1 year: paid 18.9%, price −32.7%, total −14.9%, KWEB −34.0%, +19.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

KWEB

−34.0%

KLIP

−14.9%

19.1 pts ahead of KWEB

18.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. KLIP over 1 year: paid 18.9%, price −32.7%, total −14.9%, KWEB −34.0%, +19.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

IDVO costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 28.8 points; IDVO is 16.9 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

IDVO vs KLIP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureIDVOKLIP
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+13.9%−14.9%
Price change, 1 yearrose 7.3%fell 32.7%
Return of capital, issuer estimate86% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment100% of the Sep 30, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkiShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF, measured through ACWXChina internet, measured through KWEB
Against its benchmark, same daysbehind by 3.0 ptsahead by 19.1 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.65%0.94%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$1.4bn$83m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · IDVO scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score87.1IDVO5.7KLIP

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, IDVO and KLIP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first IDVO KLIP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in IDVO
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 5.40%
Bank of Montreal 3.71%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 3.67%
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd 3.59%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc 3.31%
Siemens AG 3.14%
Southern Copper Corp 2.80%
ASML Holding NV 2.75%
Only in KLIP
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF 103.33%
2KWEB US 11/13/26 C24.93 -0.18%
2KWEB US 11/20/26 C24.41 -0.50%
2KWEB US 11/27/26 C23.14 -0.73%
2KWEB US 11/06/26 C23.86 -0.76%
2KWEB US 12/04/26 C22.74 -1.66%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Dividend stocks with call overlay on ACWX, paying monthly KLIP KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF · Covered call on KWEB, paying monthly
Strategy dividend stocks with call overlay covered call
Benchmark iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) China internet (KWEB)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 6.1% 23.5%
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.94%
Cash paid, 1 year 6.7% 18.9%
Price change, 1 year +7.3% −32.7%
Total return, 1 year +13.9% −14.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year +16.9% −34.0%
Ahead or behind −3.0 pts +19.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 86% 100%
Age 4.2 years 3.8 years
Net assets, IDVO as of Nov 3, 2026 and KLIP as of Nov 4, 2026 $1.4bn $85m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: IDVO vs KLIP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowIDVOKLIPIDVOKLIPIDVOKLIP
3 months−5.1%−5.5%1.5%5.6%−2.2 pts+9.2 pts
6 months−5.0%−8.0%2.9%10.6%−4.4 pts+10.3 pts
1 year+13.9%−14.9%6.7%18.9%−3.0 pts+19.1 pts
3 years+75.9%+10.5%23.1%67.0%+5.2 pts+11.3 pts
Since launchNot the same days: IDVO Sep 2022 · KLIP Jan 2023+104.6%+17.7%32.5%81.2%+13.8 pts+38.8 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

IDVO and KLIP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
IDVO

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IDVO paid 6.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.9%. iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) returned +16.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.1%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 86% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

KLIP

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, KLIP paid 18.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 32.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −14.9%. China internet (KWEB) returned −34.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 19.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 23.5%, paid monthly. KraneShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, IDVO or KLIP?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IDVO paid 6.7% of its starting price in cash and KLIP paid 18.9%, so KLIP paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, IDVO or KLIP?
With every distribution reinvested, IDVO returned +13.9% and KLIP −14.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, IDVO or KLIP?
IDVO charges 0.65% a year and KLIP charges 0.94%, so IDVO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IDVO against KLIP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/idvo-vs-klip

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.