Data as of .
IDVO vs KLIP: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year KLIP paid 19.5% of its price in cash against IDVO’s 6.6%, though IDVO returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: IDVO scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IDVO and KLIP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in IDVO | Only in KLIP |
|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 5.35% | KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF 99.43% |
| Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 3.64% | Cash 2.18% |
| Bank of Montreal 3.44% | 2KWEB US 09/25/26 C26.66 -0.03% |
| Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc 3.33% | 2KWEB US 10/02/26 C26.32 -0.15% |
| ASML Holding NV 2.91% | 2KWEB US 10/09/26 C26.05 -0.19% |
| Siemens AG 2.89% | 2KWEB US 10/23/26 C24.83 -0.54% |
| Southern Copper Corp 2.89% | 2KWEB US 10/16/26 C24.6 -0.70% |
| Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd 2.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDVO | KLIP | IDVO | KLIP | IDVO | KLIP | |
| 3 months | +1.6% | +0.2% | 1.5% | 6.0% | +1.0 pts | +1.8 pts |
| 6 months | +12.1% | −1.7% | 3.3% | 11.5% | −1.8 pts | +10.3 pts |
| 1 year | +21.5% | −14.7% | 6.6% | 19.5% | +5.2 pts | +22.5 pts |
| 3 years | +83.8% | +13.7% | 22.3% | 69.6% | +21.8 pts | +13.0 pts |
| Since launch | +114.5% | +18.1% | 30.9% | 80.0% | +20.8 pts | +37.6 pts |
| IDVO Amplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on EFA, paying monthly | KLIP KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF Covered call on KWEB, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Amplify | KraneShares |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | covered call |
| Benchmark | Developed Markets ex US (EFA) | China internet (KWEB) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.1% | 25.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.94% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.6% | 19.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | +14.4% | −32.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.5% | −14.7% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.3% | −37.3% |
| Ahead or behind | +5.2 pts | +22.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1471 days | 1345 days |
| Net assets | $1.4bn | $94m |
IDVO in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IDVO paid 6.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.5%. Developed Markets ex US (EFA) returned +16.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.1%, paid monthly.
KLIP in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KLIP paid 19.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 32.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −14.7%. China internet (KWEB) returned −37.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 22.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.2%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, IDVO or KLIP?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IDVO paid 6.6% of its starting price in cash and KLIP paid 19.5%, so KLIP paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, IDVO or KLIP?
- With every distribution reinvested, IDVO returned +21.5% and KLIP returned −14.7% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so IDVO returned more.
- Which is cheaper, IDVO or KLIP?
- IDVO charges 0.65% a year and KLIP charges 0.94%, so IDVO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, IDVO against KLIP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/idvo-vs-klip Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.