Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

KLIP vs NIHI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year KLIP paid 19.5% of its price in cash against NIHI’s 11.4%, though NIHI returned more with it reinvested.

KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF.

19.5%KLIP cash paid, 1 year
11.4%NIHI cash paid, 1 year
−14.7%KLIP total return, 1 year
+14.9%NIHI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: NIHI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

KLIP 55.5NIHI 64.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

KLIP22.5 pts ahead of KWEB · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
KWEB−37.3%KLIP−14.7%22.5 pts ahead of KWEBTotal return, distributions reinvestedKWEB−37.3%KLIP−14.7%22.5 pts ahead of KWEB
NIHI1.4 pts behind EFA · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
EFA+16.3%NIHI+14.9%11.4% as cash1.4 pts behind EFATotal return, distributions reinvestedEFA+16.3%NIHI+14.9%1.4 pts behind EFA

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, KLIP and NIHI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in KLIPOnly in NIHI
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF 99.43%iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF 100.13%
Cash 2.18%MXEA US 10/16/26 C3300 -0.03%
2KWEB US 09/25/26 C26.66 -0.03%MXEA US 10/16/26 C3270 -0.10%
2KWEB US 10/02/26 C26.32 -0.15%
2KWEB US 10/09/26 C26.05 -0.19%
2KWEB US 10/23/26 C24.83 -0.54%
2KWEB US 10/16/26 C24.6 -0.70%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

KLIP and NIHI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
KLIPNIHIKLIPNIHIKLIPNIHI
3 months+0.2%+1.9%6.0%2.5%+1.8 pts+1.4 pts
6 months−1.7%+14.7%11.5%5.4%+10.3 pts+0.8 pts
1 year−14.7%+14.9%19.5%11.4%+22.5 pts−1.4 pts
3 years+13.7%not published69.6%not published+13.0 ptsnot published
Since launch+18.1%+15.3%80.0%11.4%+37.6 pts−1.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
KLIP and NIHI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
KLIP
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
Covered call on KWEB, paying monthly
NIHI
NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF
Option income on EFA, paying monthly
IssuerKraneSharesNEOS
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkChina internet (KWEB)Developed Markets ex US (EFA)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized25.2%9.7%
Expense ratio0.94%0.68%
Cash paid, 1 year19.5%11.4%
Price change, 1 year−32.5%+2.8%
Total return, 1 year−14.7%+14.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year−37.3%+16.3%
Ahead or behind+22.5 pts−1.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published0%
Age1345 days366 days
Net assets$94m$204m

KLIP in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KLIP paid 19.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 32.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −14.7%. China internet (KWEB) returned −37.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 22.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.2%, paid monthly.

NIHI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, NIHI paid 11.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.9%. Developed Markets ex US (EFA) returned +16.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.7%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, KLIP or NIHI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KLIP paid 19.5% of its starting price in cash and NIHI paid 11.4%, so KLIP paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, KLIP or NIHI?
With every distribution reinvested, KLIP returned −14.7% and NIHI returned +14.9% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so NIHI returned more.
Which is cheaper, KLIP or NIHI?
KLIP charges 0.94% a year and NIHI charges 0.68%, so NIHI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

KLIP against NIHI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, KLIP against NIHI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/klip-vs-nihi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources