Data as of .
NIHI vs OVF: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OVF paid 11.5% of its price in cash against NIHI’s 11.4%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OVF scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, NIHI and OVF hold 75% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | NIHI | OVF |
|---|---|---|
| iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 100.13% | 74.87% |
| Only in NIHI | Only in OVF |
|---|---|
| MXEA US 10/16/26 C3300 -0.03% | iShares Core MSCI Emerging Mar 25.13% |
| MXEA US 10/16/26 C3270 -0.10% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIHI | OVF | NIHI | OVF | NIHI | OVF | |
| 3 months | +1.9% | −0.6% | 2.5% | 2.5% | +1.4 pts | −1.1 pts |
| 6 months | +14.7% | +16.0% | 5.4% | 5.7% | +0.8 pts | +2.1 pts |
| 1 year | +14.9% | +20.8% | 11.4% | 11.5% | −1.4 pts | +4.5 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +74.3% | not published | 26.1% | not published | +12.3 pts |
| Since launch | +15.3% | +84.2% | 11.4% | 39.8% | −1.4 pts | −15.8 pts |
| NIHI NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF Option income on EFA, paying monthly | OVF Overlay Shares Foreign Equity ETF Put-selling overlay on EFA, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | NEOS | Overlay Shares |
| Strategy | option income | put-selling overlay |
| Benchmark | Developed Markets ex US (EFA) | developed markets outside the US (EFA) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.7% | 10.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | not published |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.4% | 11.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | +2.8% | +8.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.9% | +20.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.3% | +16.3% |
| Ahead or behind | −1.4 pts | +4.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 0% | not published |
| Age | 366 days | 2544 days |
| Net assets | $204m | $41m |
NIHI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, NIHI paid 11.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.9%. Developed Markets ex US (EFA) returned +16.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.7%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
OVF in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OVF paid 11.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.8%. developed markets outside the US (EFA) returned +16.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.4%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, NIHI or OVF?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, NIHI paid 11.4% of its starting price in cash and OVF paid 11.5%, so OVF paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, NIHI or OVF?
- With every distribution reinvested, NIHI returned +14.9% and OVF returned +20.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OVF returned more.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, NIHI against OVF, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/nihi-vs-ovf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.