Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

IDUB vs NIHI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year NIHI paid 11.4% of its price in cash against IDUB’s 5.3%, though IDUB returned more with it reinvested.

Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF and NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF.

5.3%IDUB cash paid, 1 year
11.4%NIHI cash paid, 1 year
+23.5%IDUB total return, 1 year
+14.9%NIHI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: IDUB scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

IDUB 96.8NIHI 64.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

IDUB7.2 pts ahead of EFA · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
EFA+16.3%IDUB+23.5%5.3% as cash7.2 pts ahead of EFATotal return, distributions reinvestedEFA+16.3%IDUB+23.5%7.2 pts ahead of EFA
NIHI1.4 pts behind EFA · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
EFA+16.3%NIHI+14.9%11.4% of it arrived as cash1.4 pts behind EFATotal return, distributions reinvestedEFA+16.3%NIHI+14.9%1.4 pts behind EFA

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IDUB and NIHI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in IDUBOnly in NIHI
Vanguard Total International S 99.46%iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF 100.13%
TREASURY BILL 0.54%MXEA US 10/16/26 C3300 -0.03%
MXEA US 10/16/26 C3270 -0.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

IDUB and NIHI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
IDUBNIHIIDUBNIHIIDUBNIHI
3 months+0.3%+1.9%1.2%2.5%−0.3 pts+1.4 pts
6 months+18.1%+14.7%2.7%5.4%+4.2 pts+0.8 pts
1 year+23.5%+14.9%5.3%11.4%+7.2 pts−1.4 pts
3 years+66.1%not published17.6%not published+4.0 ptsnot published
Since launch+37.8%+15.3%18.2%11.4%−17.5 pts−1.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
IDUB and NIHI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IDUB
Aptus International Enhanced Yield ETF
Option income on EFA, paying quarterly
NIHI
NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF
Option income on EFA, paying monthly
IssuerAptusNEOS
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkDeveloped Markets ex US (EFA)Developed Markets ex US (EFA)
Paysquarterlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized5.0%9.7%
Expense ratio0.44%0.68%
Cash paid, 1 year5.3%11.4%
Price change, 1 year+17.4%+2.8%
Total return, 1 year+23.5%+14.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.3%+16.3%
Ahead or behind+7.2 pts−1.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published0%
Age1883 days366 days
Net assets$468m$204m

IDUB in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IDUB paid 5.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 17.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +23.5%. Developed Markets ex US (EFA) returned +16.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 7.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid quarterly.

NIHI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, NIHI paid 11.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.9%. Developed Markets ex US (EFA) returned +16.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.7%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, IDUB or NIHI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IDUB paid 5.3% of its starting price in cash and NIHI paid 11.4%, so NIHI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, IDUB or NIHI?
With every distribution reinvested, IDUB returned +23.5% and NIHI returned +14.9% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so IDUB returned more.
Which is cheaper, IDUB or NIHI?
IDUB charges 0.44% a year and NIHI charges 0.68%, so IDUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IDUB against NIHI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IDUB against NIHI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/idub-vs-nihi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources