Data as of .
KHPI vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against KHPI’s 9.1%, though KHPI returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KHPI and OMAH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in KHPI | Only in OMAH |
|---|---|
| Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 100.00% | Apple Inc 10.59% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% | |
| American Express Co 6.57% | |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94% | |
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | |
| Chevron Corp 4.75% | |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KHPI | OMAH | KHPI | OMAH | KHPI | OMAH | |
| 3 months | +1.9% | +1.7% | 2.2% | 3.7% | −0.3 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +11.3% | +8.8% | 4.7% | 7.7% | −6.8 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 1 year | +11.0% | +8.8% | 9.1% | 14.4% | −5.5 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Since launch | +24.6% | +14.6% | 18.4% | 21.4% | −17.7 pts | +12.4 pts |
| KHPI Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Kensington | VistaShares |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.0% | 15.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.1% | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +1.5% | −6.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.0% | +8.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +3.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −5.5 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 743 days | 562 days |
| Net assets | $401m | $1.1bn |
KHPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KHPI paid 9.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.0%, paid monthly.
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, KHPI or OMAH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KHPI paid 9.1% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.4%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, KHPI or OMAH?
- With every distribution reinvested, KHPI returned +11.0% and OMAH returned +8.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so KHPI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, KHPI or OMAH?
- KHPI charges 0.98% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so KHPI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KHPI against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/khpi-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.