Which paid more, JULH or SBAR?

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting price in cash and SBAR paid 11.8%, so SBAR paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, JULH or SBAR?

With every distribution reinvested, JULH returned +4.1% and SBAR +7.5% over the year to Nov 12, 2026.

Which is cheaper, JULH or SBAR?

JULH charges 0.79% a year and SBAR charges 0.77%, so SBAR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 12, 2026.

Share on X Download as PDF

JULH vs SBAR: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Return, fees and overlap, side by side.

Return gap

+3.4 pts

1 year to Nov 12, 2026: SBAR ahead, total return

Fee gap

0.02 pts

A year: JULH 0.79%, SBAR 0.77%, per filings dated Jul 1, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026

Overlap

–

No book read for both funds

Net flow

–

Needs daily flows for both funds

Pair scorecard

SBAR costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; SBAR is far larger, $441m against $18m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

JULH vs SBAR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	JULH	SBAR
Paid and earned
Measure	JULH	SBAR
Total return, 1 year	+4.1%	+7.5%
Price change, 1 year	fell 0.8%	fell 4.8%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	51% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment	77% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	JULH	SBAR
Benchmark	S&P 500, measured through SPY	not published
Cost and size
Measure	JULH	SBAR
Expense ratio	0.79%	0.77%
Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026	$18m	$441m
Holdings
Measure	JULH	SBAR
Holdings in common	not published

Method

Key numbers

4.8%

JULH cash paid, 1 year

11.8%

SBAR cash paid, 1 year

+4.1%

JULH total return, 1 year

+7.5%

SBAR total return, 1 year

JULH · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 7.9 pts behind SPY

JULH

+4.1%

SPY

+12.0%

7.9 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.8%, total +4.1%, SPY +12.0%, −7.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

JULH

+4.1%

4.8% of it arrived as cash

7.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

7.9 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.8%, total +4.1%, SPY +12.0%, −7.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SPY

+12.0%

JULH

+4.1%

7.9 pts behind SPY

4.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.8%, total +4.1%, SPY +12.0%, −7.9 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SBAR · 1 year to Nov 12, 2026 Not measured

SBAR

+7.5%

none

Not measured

SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SBAR

+7.5%

11.8% of it arrived as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

SBAR

+7.5%

11.8% cash

11.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SBAR over 1 year: paid 11.8%, price −4.8%, total +7.5%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Data to Nov 12, 2026.

Side by side

JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly SBAR Simplify Barrier Income ETF · Defined income, paying monthly

Issuer Innovator Simplify

Strategy defined income defined income

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) not set

Pays quarterly monthly

Payout rate, annualized 6.6% 12.0%

Expense ratio 0.79% 0.77%

Cash paid, 1 year 4.8% 11.8%

Price change, 1 year −0.8% −4.8%

Total return, 1 year +4.1% +7.5%

Benchmark return, 1 year +12.0% not published

Ahead or behind −7.9 pts not available

Return of capital, latest estimate 51% 77%

Age 3.4 years 1.6 years

Net assets, JULH as of Nov 12, 2026 and SBAR as of Nov 11, 2026 $18m $441m

As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: JULH vs SBAR: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	JULH	SBAR	JULH	SBAR	JULH	SBAR
3 months	+0.8%	−0.8%	1.6%	2.9%	+3.2 pts	not measured
6 months	+2.7%	+2.7%	2.7%	5.8%	+1.0 pts	not measured
1 year	+4.1%	+7.5%	4.8%	11.8%	−7.9 pts	not measured
3 years	+19.8%	–	18.3%	–	−58.5 pts	–
Since launchNot the same days: JULH Jul 2023 · SBAR Apr 2025	+23.2%	+19.7%	20.3%	19.0%	−54.3 pts	not measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

JULH

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.9 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.6%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 51% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

SBAR

Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, SBAR paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 4.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.5%. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Simplify estimates that 77% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JULH or SBAR?: Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting price in cash and SBAR paid 11.8%, so SBAR paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JULH or SBAR?: With every distribution reinvested, JULH returned +4.1% and SBAR +7.5% over the year to Nov 12, 2026.
Which is cheaper, JULH or SBAR?: JULH charges 0.79% a year and SBAR charges 0.77%, so SBAR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

JULH vs PAPI JULH vs TSPY JULH vs YMAG JULH vs XPAY SBAR vs APRH SBAR vs APRJ SBAR vs ACSP SBAR vs ACEI

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →JULH on its own →SBAR on its own →JULH dividend history →SBAR dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

JULH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

JULH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

JULH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Innovator page for JULH ↗

SBAR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SBAR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

SBAR 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Simplify website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JULH against SBAR, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-sbar

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.

Net assets: $18m on Nov 12, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July, and $441m on Nov 11, 2026 for Simplify Barrier Income ETF.

JULH on its own →SBAR on its own →

Growth of 100

JULH and SBAR

Total return, distributions reinvested, 1 year.

JULH +4.1%SBAR +7.5%

Nov 12, 2025Nov 12, 2026

JULH +4.1%, SBAR +7.5%: SBAR +3.4 pts ahead, 1 year, Nov 12, 2025 to Nov 12, 2026.