Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
JULH vs QDTE: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTE paid 34.7% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about JULH and QDTE
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $18m for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July and $881m for Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.
9.9 pts behind SPY
JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
JULH
+4.9%
4.8% of it arrived as cash
9.9 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
9.9 pts behind SPY
JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
JULH
+4.9%
9.9 pts behind SPY
4.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.1.4 pts ahead of QQQ
QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.3%
QDTE
+13.7%
34.7% of it arrived as cash
1.4 pts ahead of QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.4 pts ahead of QQQ
QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+12.3%
QDTE
+13.7%
34.7% as cash
1.4 pts ahead of QQQ
34.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QDTE over 1 year: paid 34.7%, price −23.4%, total +13.7%, QQQ +12.3%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
JULH costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.8 points; QDTE is far larger, $881m against $18m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | JULH | QDTE |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.9% | +13.7% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 0.0% | fell 23.4% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 51% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment | 100% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | S&P 500, measured through SPY | Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.96% |
| Net assets | $18m | $881m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, JULH and QDTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | JULH | QDTE | JULH | QDTE | JULH | QDTE |
| 3 months | +1.4% | −1.6% | 1.6% | 6.3% | +1.5 pts | +1.8 pts |
| 6 months | +3.2% | +1.6% | 2.7% | 14.3% | −1.8 pts | +2.0 pts |
| 1 year | +4.9% | +13.7% | 4.8% | 34.7% | −9.9 pts | +1.5 pts |
| 3 years | +20.9% | – | 18.4% | – | −62.0 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: JULH Jul 2023 · QDTE Mar 2024 | +23.7% | +55.2% | 20.3% | 75.6% | −56.1 pts | −2.3 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
JULH
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 51% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
QDTE
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTE paid 34.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 23.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.7%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 27.9%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JULH against QDTE, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-qdte
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). JULH against QDTE. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-qdte
[JULH against QDTE (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-qdte)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.