Data as of .
QDTE vs TPRY: which paid, and which earned it?
QDTE and TPRY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QDTE and TPRY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in QDTE | Only in TPRY |
|---|---|
| NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C 25.90% | Micron Technology Inc 13.23% |
| QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C 24.77% | Amazon.com Inc 12.40% |
| NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C 22.64% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 8.48% |
| QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C 17.82% | Alphabet Inc 6.91% |
| Roundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF 4.97% | Meta Platforms Inc 5.35% |
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 3.90% | Uber Technologies Inc 5.23% |
| Apple Inc 4.91% | |
| Vistra Corp 4.57% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDTE | TPRY | QDTE | TPRY | QDTE | TPRY | |
| 3 months | −0.9% | −5.9% | 7.6% | 3.5% | +1.6 pts | −8.2 pts |
| 6 months | +19.7% | +11.9% | 16.2% | 8.1% | −4.5 pts | −6.1 pts |
| 1 year | +21.1% | not published | 36.1% | not published | −0.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +59.9% | +2.1% | 74.1% | 7.4% | −4.3 pts | −9.3 pts |
| QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | TPRY VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Roundhill | VistaShares |
| Strategy | 0DTE covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 20.8% | 15.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.96% | 0.95% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 36.1% | 7.4% (since launch on Feb 26, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −19.2% | −5.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.1% | +2.1% (since launch on Feb 26, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +11.4% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.7 pts | −9.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 925 days | 204 days |
| Net assets | $967m | $4m |
QDTE in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTE paid 36.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 19.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.8%, paid weekly.
TPRY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 26, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, TPRY paid 7.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +11.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, QDTE or TPRY?
- QDTE charges 0.96% a year and TPRY charges 0.95%, so TPRY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTE against TPRY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdte-vs-tpry Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.