Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

JULH vs PBP: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, PBP paid 11.7% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about JULH and PBP

Net assets: $18m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July, and $389m on Nov 3, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF.

At a glance
4.8%
JULH cash paid, 1 year
11.7%
PBP cash paid, 1 year
+4.9%
JULH total return, 1 year
+16.2%
PBP total return, 1 year
JULH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.9 pts behind SPY
JULH
+4.9%
SPY
+14.8%

9.9 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULH

+4.9%

4.8% as cash

9.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.9 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULH

+4.9%

9.9 pts behind SPY

4.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
PBP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.4 pts ahead of SPY
PBP
+16.2%
SPY
+14.8%

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

PBP over 1 year: paid 11.7%, price +3.6%, total +16.2%, SPY +14.8%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

PBP

+16.2%

11.7% of it arrived as cash

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

PBP over 1 year: paid 11.7%, price +3.6%, total +16.2%, SPY +14.8%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

PBP

+16.2%

11.7% as cash

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

11.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +16.2%. PBP over 1 year: paid 11.7%, price +3.6%, total +16.2%, SPY +14.8%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Both charts share one scale, 0 to +16.2%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

PBP costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.3 points; PBP is far larger, $389m against $17m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

JULH vs PBP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureJULHPBP
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+4.9%+16.2%
Price change, 1 yearfell 0.0%rose 3.6%
Return of capital, issuer estimate51% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment95% of the Oct 23, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.29%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$17m$389m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · PBP scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score58.4JULH75.1PBP

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, JULH and PBP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first JULH PBP
Only in one fund ↓
Only in JULH
Only in PBP
NVIDIA Corp 7.71%
Apple Inc 7.47%
Microsoft Corp 5.96%
Amazon.com Inc 3.79%
Alphabet Inc 2.53%
Broadcom Inc 2.44%
Meta Platforms Inc 2.11%
Alphabet Inc 2.04%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
Strategy defined income covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays quarterly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 6.5% 8.5%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.29%
Cash paid, 1 year 4.8% 11.7%
Price change, 1 year 0.0% +3.6%
Total return, 1 year +4.9% +16.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +14.8%
Ahead or behind −9.9 pts +1.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 51% 95%
Age 3.3 years 18.9 years
Net assets, JULH as of Nov 4, 2026 and PBP as of Nov 3, 2026 $18m $389m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: JULH vs PBP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowJULHPBPJULHPBPJULHPBP
3 months+1.4%+2.5%1.6%2.5%+1.5 pts+2.6 pts
6 months+3.2%+8.1%2.7%5.3%−1.8 pts+3.1 pts
1 year+4.9%+16.2%4.8%11.7%−9.9 pts+1.4 pts
3 years+20.9%+49.6%18.4%33.4%−62.0 pts−33.3 pts
Since launchNot the same days: JULH Jul 2023 · PBP Dec 2007+23.7%+172.0%20.3%92.4%−56.1 pts−467.6 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

JULH and PBP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
JULH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 51% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

PBP

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, PBP paid 11.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly. Invesco estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Oct 23, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JULH or PBP?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting price in cash and PBP paid 11.7%, so PBP paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JULH or PBP?
With every distribution reinvested, JULH returned +4.9% and PBP +16.2% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, JULH or PBP?
JULH charges 0.79% a year and PBP charges 0.29%, so PBP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JULH against PBP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-pbp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.