IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

JULH vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about JULH and OMAH

Net assets: $18m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July, and $1.1bn on Nov 3, 2026 for VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF.

JULH on its own →OMAH on its own →
At a glance
4.8%
JULH cash paid, 1 year
14.7%
OMAH cash paid, 1 year
+4.9%
JULH total return, 1 year
+13.5%
OMAH total return, 1 year
JULH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.9 pts behind SPY
JULH
+4.9%
SPY
+14.8%

9.9 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULH

+4.9%

4.8% of it arrived as cash

9.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.9 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULH

+4.9%

9.9 pts behind SPY

4.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
OMAH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH
+13.5%
SPY
+14.8%

1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OMAH

+13.5%

14.7% of it arrived as cash

1.3 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OMAH

+13.5%

14.7% as cash

1.3 pts behind SPY

14.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

JULH costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.6 points; OMAH is far larger, $1.1bn against $17m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

JULH vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureJULHOMAH
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+4.9%+13.5%
Price change, 1 yearfell 0.0%fell 2.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate51% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.98%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$17m$1.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · JULH scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score58.4JULH53OMAH

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, JULH and OMAH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first JULH OMAH
Only in one fund ↓
Only in JULH
Only in OMAH
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.99%
Apple Inc 10.43%
American Express Co 6.64%
Kroger Co 5.21%
Coca-Cola Co 5.08%
Sirius XM Holdings Inc 4.97%
VeriSign Inc 4.86%
Moody's Corp 4.72%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
Issuer Innovator VistaShares
Strategy defined income covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays quarterly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 6.5% 15.0%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.98%
Cash paid, 1 year 4.8% 14.7%
Price change, 1 year 0.0% −2.4%
Total return, 1 year +4.9% +13.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +14.8%
Ahead or behind −9.9 pts −1.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 51% 100%
Age 3.3 years 1.7 years
Net assets, JULH as of Nov 4, 2026 and OMAH as of Nov 3, 2026 $18m $1.1bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: JULH vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowJULHOMAHJULHOMAHJULHOMAH
3 months+1.4%+2.5%1.6%3.7%+1.5 pts+2.6 pts
6 months+3.2%+6.2%2.7%7.4%−1.8 pts+1.2 pts
1 year+4.9%+13.5%4.8%14.7%−9.9 pts−1.3 pts
3 years+20.9%–18.4%–−62.0 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: JULH Jul 2023 · OMAH Mar 2025+23.7%+19.2%20.3%23.7%−56.1 pts−14.9 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

JULH and OMAH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
JULH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 51% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

OMAH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JULH or OMAH?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.7%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JULH or OMAH?
With every distribution reinvested, JULH returned +4.9% and OMAH +13.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, JULH or OMAH?
JULH charges 0.79% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so JULH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
JULH vs ROCYJULH vs BALIJULH vs KHPIJULH vs DUBSOMAH vs SPUTOMAH vs SCLZOMAH vs OCTHOMAH vs QUSA
Where to next
S&P 500 (SPY) →JULH on its own →OMAH on its own →JULH dividend history →OMAH dividend history →OMAH holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
JULH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
JULH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
JULH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
Innovator page for JULH ↗
OMAH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
OMAH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
OMAH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
VistaShares page for OMAH ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JULH against OMAH, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-omah

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.