Data as of .
OMAH vs QUSA: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against QUSA’s 13.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and QUSA hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | OMAH | QUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 10.59% | 5.99% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 10.22% | 5.35% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The | 4.94% | 4.33% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.57% | 2.22% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.54% | 1.84% |
| BRKB US 09/25/26 P512.5 | 0.10% | 0.05% |
| AAPL US 09/25/26 C342.5 | 0.05% | 0.03% |
| KO US 09/25/26 C91 | 0.01% | 0.00% |
| GOOGL US 09/25/26 C365 | -0.01% | 0.01% |
| KO US 09/25/26 C89 | -0.03% | -0.02% |
| AAPL US 09/25/26 C337.5 | -0.11% | -0.06% |
| BRKB US 09/25/26 P517.5 | -0.17% | -0.08% |
| Only in OMAH | Only in QUSA |
|---|---|
| American Express Co 6.57% | Microsoft Corp 6.08% |
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | NVIDIA Corp 5.78% |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | Caterpillar Inc 4.91% |
| Chevron Corp 4.75% | Broadcom Inc 4.70% |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% | Costco Wholesale Corp 4.40% |
| Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% | Meta Platforms Inc 4.28% |
| Chubb Ltd 4.49% | Eli Lilly & Co 4.24% |
| Kraft Heinz Co/The 4.46% | Walmart Inc 4.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | QUSA | OMAH | QUSA | OMAH | QUSA | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | −1.9% | 3.7% | 3.6% | −2.4 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | +8.8% | +10.4% | 7.7% | 7.8% | +2.8 pts | −4.3 pts |
| 1 year | +8.8% | +3.5% | 14.4% | 13.8% | +4.9 pts | −11.7 pts |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +4.9% | 21.4% | 15.1% | +12.4 pts | −25.8 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | QUSA VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | VistaShares |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 15.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.97% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 13.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | −11.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +3.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +15.2% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | −11.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 562 days | 500 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $22m |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
QUSA in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OMAH or QUSA?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting price in cash and QUSA paid 13.8%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OMAH or QUSA?
- With every distribution reinvested, OMAH returned +8.8% and QUSA returned +3.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OMAH returned more.
- Which is cheaper, OMAH or QUSA?
- OMAH charges 0.98% a year and QUSA charges 0.97%, so QUSA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against QUSA, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-qusa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.