Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
OMAH vs QUSA: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its price in cash against QUSA’s 14.6%, and returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about OMAH and QUSA
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $1.1bn for VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF and $20m for VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF.
1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
OMAH
+13.5%
14.7% of it arrived as cash
1.3 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
OMAH
+13.5%
14.7% as cash
1.3 pts behind SPY
14.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.12.9 pts behind SPY
QUSA over 1 year: paid 14.6%, price −12.3%, total +1.9%, SPY +14.8%, −12.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
QUSA
+1.9%
14.6% cash
12.9 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
12.9 pts behind SPY
QUSA over 1 year: paid 14.6%, price −12.3%, total +1.9%, SPY +14.8%, −12.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
QUSA
+1.9%
12.9 pts behind SPY
14.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QUSA over 1 year: paid 14.6%, price −12.3%, total +1.9%, SPY +14.8%, −12.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
QUSA costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.6 points; OMAH is far larger, $1.1bn against $20m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | OMAH | QUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +13.5% | +1.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 2.4% | fell 12.3% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | S&P 500, measured through SPY | S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.97% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $1.1bn | $20m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 11% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
May 16, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 76 weekly returns · each against SPYFrom May 2025 to Oct 2026, OMAH returned more: +14.8% to −5.8%. OMAH swung less: 8.7% to 10.4%. OMAH fell less at its worst: −4.5% to −9.7%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | OMAH | QUSA | SPY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +14.8% | −5.8% | OMAH | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +9.9% | −4.0% | OMAH | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | −8.3% | −22.0% | OMAH | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 8.7% | 10.4% | OMAH | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 5.9% | 8.2% | OMAH | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −4.5% | −9.7% | OMAH | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 33.4% | 41.5% | 100.0% | QUSA | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 40.8% | 101.9% | 100.0% | OMAH | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 0.38 | 0.69 | 1.00 | OMAH lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.26 | 0.61 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 0.68 | −0.72 | OMAH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 1.00 | −0.91 | OMAH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.156 | −0.108 | 0.144 | OMAH | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 2.19 | −0.42 | OMAH | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | SPY | SPY | SPY | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.5% a year | −17.4% a year | 0.0% | QUSA significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.07 | −3.21 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −12.0% to +13.0% | −28.3% to −6.6% | OMAH's includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | −0.81 | −2.97 | OMAH | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 10.4% | 7.4% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 76 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and QUSA hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.
half
11% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | OMAH | QUSA | OMAH | QUSA | OMAH | QUSA |
| 3 months | +2.5% | −8.5% | 3.7% | 3.6% | +2.6 pts | −8.4 pts |
| 6 months | +6.2% | −5.5% | 7.4% | 7.3% | +1.2 pts | −10.5 pts |
| 1 year | +13.5% | +1.9% | 14.7% | 14.6% | −1.3 pts | −12.8 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: OMAH Mar 2025 · QUSA May 2025 | +19.2% | −1.8% | 23.7% | 17.3% | −14.9 pts | −41.3 pts |
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
OMAH
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
QUSA
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QUSA paid 14.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 12.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.4%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, OMAH against QUSA, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-qusa
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). OMAH against QUSA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-qusa
[OMAH against QUSA (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-qusa)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.