Data as of .
QUSA vs ROCY: which paid, and which earned it?
QUSA and ROCY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QUSA and ROCY hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | QUSA | ROCY |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 5.99% | 6.71% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 5.78% | 8.37% |
| Microsoft Corp | 6.08% | 4.97% |
| Broadcom Inc | 4.70% | 2.61% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 4.28% | 2.43% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.22% | 5.33% |
| Lam Research Corp | 3.47% | 1.76% |
| Mastercard Inc | 2.51% | 1.57% |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 4.24% | 1.47% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 5.35% | 0.73% |
| Walmart Inc | 4.17% | 0.43% |
| Johnson & Johnson | 2.93% | 0.39% |
| Only in QUSA | Only in ROCY |
|---|---|
| Caterpillar Inc 4.91% | Amazon.com, Inc. 4.15% |
| Visa Inc 3.37% | Micron Technology, Inc. 3.00% |
| Blackrock Inc 2.99% | Wells Fargo & Co. 2.15% |
| GE AEROSPACE 2.75% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.69% |
| KLA CORP 2.69% | Exxon Mobil Corp. 1.63% |
| Applied Materials Inc 2.61% | Tesla, Inc. 1.55% |
| Abbott Laboratories 2.35% | AbbVie, Inc. 1.46% |
| Adobe Inc 2.32% | Seagate Technology Holdings plc 1.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUSA | ROCY | QUSA | ROCY | QUSA | ROCY | |
| 3 months | −1.9% | +2.6% | 3.6% | 1.7% | −3.6 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 6 months | +10.4% | +14.8% | 7.8% | 3.7% | −4.3 pts | −3.3 pts |
| 1 year | +3.5% | not published | 13.8% | not published | −11.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +4.9% | +13.5% | 15.1% | 3.6% | −25.8 pts | −2.9 pts |
| QUSA VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly | ROCY JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | JPMorgan |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.3% | 5.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.97% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 13.8% | 3.6% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −11.0% | +9.7% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.5% | +13.5% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +15.2% | +16.4% |
| Ahead or behind | −11.7 pts | −2.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 500 days | 183 days |
| Net assets | $22m | $726m |
QUSA in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
ROCY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ROCY paid 3.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, QUSA or ROCY?
- QUSA charges 0.97% a year and ROCY charges 0.35%, so ROCY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, QUSA against ROCY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qusa-vs-rocy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.