Which paid more, DUBS or JULH?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting price in cash and JULH paid 4.8%, so JULH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, DUBS or JULH?

With every distribution reinvested, DUBS returned +18.6% and JULH +4.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, DUBS or JULH?

DUBS charges 0.40% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so DUBS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

DUBS vs JULH: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its price in cash against DUBS’s 2.3%, though DUBS returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DUBS and JULH

Net assets: $398m on Jul 31, 2026 for Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF, and $18m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July.

DUBS on its own →JULH on its own →

At a glance

2.3%

DUBS cash paid, 1 year

4.8%

JULH cash paid, 1 year

+18.6%

DUBS total return, 1 year

+4.9%

JULH total return, 1 year

DUBS · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 3.8 pts ahead of SPY

DUBS

+18.6%

SPY

+14.8%

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

DUBS

+18.6%

2.3% cash

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

DUBS

+18.6%

3.8 pts ahead of SPY

2.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DUBS over 1 year: paid 2.3%, price +16.0%, total +18.6%, SPY +14.8%, +3.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

JULH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.9 pts behind SPY

JULH

+4.9%

SPY

+14.8%

9.9 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULH

+4.9%

4.8% as cash

9.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.9 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULH

+4.9%

9.9 pts behind SPY

4.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +18.6%. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Both charts share one scale, 0 to +18.6%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

DUBS costs 0.39 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 13.7 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DUBS vs JULH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	DUBS	JULH
Paid and earned
Measure	DUBS	JULH
Total return, 1 year	+18.6%	+4.9%
Price change, 1 year	rose 16.0%	fell 0.0%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	71% of the Sep 30, 2026 payment	51% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	DUBS	JULH
Benchmark	S&P 500, measured through SPY	S&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Measure	DUBS	JULH
Expense ratio	0.40%	0.79%
Net assets, DUBS as of Jul 31, 2026 and JULH as of Nov 4, 2026	$398m	$18m
Holdings
Measure	DUBS	JULH
Holdings in common	0%

ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · DUBS scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?

IQ Income Score97.9DUBS58.4JULH

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

DUBS 97.9

JULH 58.4

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, DUBS and JULH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DUBS JULH

Only in one fund ↓

Only in DUBS

State Street SPDR Portfolio S& 73.21%

BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core E 24.71%

Only in JULH

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF · Option income on SPY, paying quarterly JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly

Issuer Aptus Innovator

Strategy option income defined income

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays quarterly quarterly

Payout rate, annualized 2.2% 6.5%

Expense ratio 0.40% 0.79%

Cash paid, 1 year 2.3% 4.8%

Price change, 1 year +16.0% 0.0%

Total return, 1 year +18.6% +4.9%

Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +14.8%

Ahead or behind +3.8 pts −9.9 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 71% 51%

Age 3.4 years 3.3 years

Net assets, DUBS as of Jul 31, 2026 and JULH as of Nov 4, 2026 $398m $18m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: DUBS vs JULH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	DUBS	JULH	DUBS	JULH	DUBS	JULH
3 months	+0.6%	+1.4%	0.6%	1.6%	+0.7 pts	+1.5 pts
6 months	+6.7%	+3.2%	1.1%	2.7%	+1.7 pts	−1.8 pts
1 year	+18.6%	+4.9%	2.3%	4.8%	+3.8 pts	−9.9 pts
3 years	+85.1%	+20.9%	9.9%	18.4%	+2.2 pts	−62.0 pts
Since launchNot the same days: DUBS Jun 2023 · JULH Jul 2023	+86.4%	+23.7%	10.2%	20.3%	+3.2 pts	−56.1 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

DUBS

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 16.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.2%, paid quarterly. Aptus estimates that 71% of the distribution paid Sep 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

JULH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 51% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DUBS or JULH?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting price in cash and JULH paid 4.8%, so JULH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DUBS or JULH?: With every distribution reinvested, DUBS returned +18.6% and JULH +4.9% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, DUBS or JULH?: DUBS charges 0.40% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so DUBS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DUBS vs JOYT DUBS vs SPUT DUBS vs SCLZ DUBS vs OCTH JULH vs KHPI JULH vs PBP JULH vs IVVW JULH vs XDTE

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →DUBS on its own →JULH on its own →DUBS dividend history →DUBS holdings →JULH dividend history →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DUBS filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DUBS prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

DUBS 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Aptus website ↗

JULH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

JULH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

JULH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Innovator page for JULH ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DUBS against JULH, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-julh

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.