Data as of .
DUBS vs JULH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year JULH paid 4.7% of its price in cash against DUBS’s 2.3%, though DUBS returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DUBS scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DUBS and JULH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DUBS | JULH |
|---|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL | 0.11% | 100.00% |
| Only in DUBS | Only in JULH |
|---|---|
| State Street SPDR Portfolio S& 74.61% | |
| BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core E 25.28% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUBS | JULH | DUBS | JULH | DUBS | JULH | |
| 3 months | +3.2% | +1.8% | 0.5% | 1.1% | +1.0 pts | −0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +20.3% | +4.0% | 1.2% | 2.7% | +2.3 pts | −14.0 pts |
| 1 year | +20.3% | +4.5% | 2.3% | 4.7% | +3.7 pts | −12.1 pts |
| 3 years | +80.1% | +20.7% | 9.1% | 18.4% | +1.7 pts | −57.7 pts |
| Since launch | +84.4% | +22.7% | 9.3% | 18.6% | +2.4 pts | −55.9 pts |
| DUBS Aptus Large Cap Enhanced Yield ETF Option income on SPY, paying quarterly | JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Aptus | Innovator |
| Strategy | option income | defined income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | quarterly | quarterly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 2.1% | 4.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 2.3% | 4.7% |
| Price change, 1 year | +17.6% | −0.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.3% | +4.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +3.7 pts | −12.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1192 days | 1173 days |
| Net assets | $353m | $17m |
DUBS in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 17.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 2.1%, paid quarterly.
JULH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.2%, paid quarterly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DUBS or JULH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DUBS paid 2.3% of its starting price in cash and JULH paid 4.7%, so JULH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DUBS or JULH?
- With every distribution reinvested, DUBS returned +20.3% and JULH returned +4.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DUBS returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DUBS or JULH?
- DUBS charges 0.40% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so DUBS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DUBS against JULH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dubs-vs-julh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.