Data as of .
JULH vs LOCT: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year LOCT paid 5.2% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: LOCT scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JULH and LOCT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | JULH | LOCT |
|---|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL | 100.00% | 0.43% |
| Only in JULH | Only in LOCT |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 98.30% | |
| TREASURY BILL 0.43% | |
| TREASURY BILL 0.42% | |
| TREASURY BILL 0.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JULH | LOCT | JULH | LOCT | JULH | LOCT | |
| 3 months | +1.8% | +1.0% | 1.1% | 1.3% | −0.4 pts | −1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +4.0% | +3.9% | 2.7% | 2.6% | −14.0 pts | −14.1 pts |
| 1 year | +4.5% | +5.4% | 4.7% | 5.2% | −12.1 pts | −11.2 pts |
| 3 years | +20.7% | not published | 18.4% | not published | −57.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +22.7% | +18.5% | 18.6% | 16.5% | −55.9 pts | −66.4 pts |
| JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly | LOCT Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - October Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Innovator | Innovator |
| Strategy | defined income | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | quarterly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 4.2% | 5.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 4.7% | 5.2% |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.4% | +0.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.5% | +5.4% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −12.1 pts | −11.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1173 days | 1082 days |
| Net assets | $17m | $11m |
JULH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.2%, paid quarterly.
LOCT in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, LOCT paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.2%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, JULH or LOCT?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting price in cash and LOCT paid 5.2%, so LOCT paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, JULH or LOCT?
- With every distribution reinvested, JULH returned +4.5% and LOCT returned +5.4% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so LOCT returned more.
- Which is cheaper, JULH or LOCT?
- JULH charges 0.79% a year and LOCT charges 0.79%, so JULH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JULH against LOCT, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-loct Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.