Data as of Nov 12, 2026.
INK vs XYLG: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Return, fees and overlap, side by side.
Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.35% a year; XYLG is 13.8 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | INK | XYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +13.0% |
| Price change | fell 1.2% (since Nov 4, 2026) | fell 0.7% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 80% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | not published | S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Against its benchmark, same days | ahead by 1.0 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 11, 2026 | $5.3m | $73m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | not published | |
Not measured
INK since launch: paid 0.0%, price −1.2%, total −1.2%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
INK
−1.2%
Total return, distributions reinvested
Not measured
INK since launch: paid 0.0%, price −1.2%, total −1.2%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
INK
−1.2%
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. INK since launch: paid 0.0%, price −1.2%, total −1.2%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.1 pt ahead of SPY
XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.6%, price −0.7%, total +13.0%, SPY +12.0%, +1.0 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
SPY
+12.0%
XYLG
+13.0%
12.6% of it arrived as cash
1 pt ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
1 pt ahead of SPY
XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.6%, price −0.7%, total +13.0%, SPY +12.0%, +1.0 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
SPY
+12.0%
XYLG
+13.0%
12.6% as cash
1 pt ahead of SPY
12.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XYLG over 1 year: paid 12.6%, price −0.7%, total +13.0%, SPY +12.0%, +1.0 pts. Data to Nov 12, 2026.
Data to Nov 12, 2026.Side by side
As of Nov 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | INK | XYLG | INK | XYLG | INK | XYLG |
| 3 months | – | −0.5% | – | 1.1% | – | +2.0 pts |
| 6 months | – | +4.2% | – | 2.5% | – | +2.5 pts |
| 1 year | – | +13.0% | – | 12.6% | – | +1.0 pts |
| 3 years | – | +62.2% | – | 43.9% | – | −16.2 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: INK Nov 2026 · XYLG Sep 2020 | −1.2% | +113.5% | 0.0% | 69.8% | not measured | −37.7 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
INK
Over the period from its first trade on Nov 4, 2026 to Nov 12, 2026, INK paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.2%.
XYLG
Over the year to Nov 12, 2026, XYLG paid 12.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.0 pts. At its price on Nov 12, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.5%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, INK against XYLG, data as of Nov 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ink-vs-xylg
ETFIQ. (Nov 12, 2026). INK against XYLG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ink-vs-xylg
[INK against XYLG (ETFIQ, Nov 12, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ink-vs-xylg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.
INK and XYLG both write options for income.