Data as of .
HEMI vs OARK: which paid, and which earned it?
HEMI and OARK both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HEMI and OARK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in HEMI | Only in OARK |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 9.11% | United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 31.97% |
| Alphabet Inc 7.69% | United States Treasury Bill 02/18/2027 31.91% |
| Apple Inc 5.86% | United States Treasury Bill 07/08/2027 22.43% |
| Amazon.com Inc 5.73% | 2ARKK US 11/20/26 C85.01 FLX 8.43% |
| Microsoft Corp 5.72% | United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 6.55% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.02% | United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 3.23% |
| Meta Platforms Inc 2.66% | First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 1.09% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.42% | ARKK US 09/25/26 C86 0.66% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEMI | OARK | HEMI | OARK | HEMI | OARK | |
| 3 months | +0.8% | +3.9% | 2.2% | 9.0% | −1.5 pts | +6.4 pts |
| 6 months | +13.6% | +20.0% | 4.9% | 22.6% | −4.5 pts | −4.2 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +6.6% | not published | 37.4% | not published | −15.2 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +61.9% | not published | 87.5% | not published | −36.3 pts |
| Since launch | +11.2% | +58.8% | 6.0% | 89.4% | −3.4 pts | −96.7 pts |
| HEMI Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | OARK YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Hartford | YieldMax |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.1% | 27.9% |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 1.00% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.0% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025) | 37.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +4.9% | −34.0% |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.2% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025) | +6.6% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +14.7% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | −3.4 pts | −15.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 0% |
| Age | 275 days | 1395 days |
| Net assets | $33m | $32m |
HEMI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Dec 17, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, HEMI paid 6.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.
OARK in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OARK paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 34.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 27.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, HEMI or OARK?
- HEMI charges 0.49% a year and OARK charges 1.00%, so HEMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HEMI against OARK, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hemi-vs-oark Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.