Data as of .
HEMI vs MAGY: which paid, and which earned it?
HEMI and MAGY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, HEMI and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in HEMI | Only in MAGY |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp 9.11% | Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02% |
| Alphabet Inc 7.69% | First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36% |
| Apple Inc 5.86% | MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38% |
| Amazon.com Inc 5.73% | |
| Microsoft Corp 5.72% | |
| Broadcom Inc 4.02% | |
| Meta Platforms Inc 2.66% | |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEMI | MAGY | HEMI | MAGY | HEMI | MAGY | |
| 3 months | +0.8% | +3.7% | 2.2% | 6.1% | −1.5 pts | −3.9 pts |
| 6 months | +13.6% | +8.1% | 4.9% | 12.9% | −4.5 pts | −12.7 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +1.8% | not published | 26.5% | not published | −9.4 pts |
| Since launch | +11.2% | +25.6% | 6.0% | 42.0% | −3.4 pts | −37.5 pts |
| HEMI Hartford Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | MAGY Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Hartford | Roundhill |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Magnificent Seven (MAGS) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 9.1% | 19.2% |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.99% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 6.0% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025) | 26.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | +4.9% | −25.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.2% (since launch on Dec 17, 2025) | +1.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +14.7% | +11.2% |
| Ahead or behind | −3.4 pts | −9.4 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 275 days | 513 days |
| Net assets | $33m | $102m |
HEMI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Dec 17, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, HEMI paid 6.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +11.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.
MAGY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, HEMI or MAGY?
- HEMI charges 0.49% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so HEMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, HEMI against MAGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/hemi-vs-magy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.