Data as of .
OARK vs RNTY: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OARK paid 37.4% of its price in cash against RNTY’s 11.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: RNTY scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OARK and RNTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | OARK | RNTY |
|---|---|---|
| First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | 1.09% | 0.30% |
| Only in OARK | Only in RNTY |
|---|---|
| United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 31.97% | Prologis Inc 6.72% |
| United States Treasury Bill 02/18/2027 31.91% | Welltower Inc 6.63% |
| United States Treasury Bill 07/08/2027 22.43% | Vivmark Residential 6.31% |
| 2ARKK US 11/20/26 C85.01 FLX 8.43% | Digital Realty Trust Inc 5.99% |
| United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 6.55% | Simon Property Group Inc 5.30% |
| United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 3.23% | Equinix Inc 4.92% |
| ARKK US 09/25/26 C86 0.66% | St Joe Co/The 4.41% |
| ARKK US 09/25/26 C91 0.26% | Realty Income Corp 4.36% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OARK | RNTY | OARK | RNTY | OARK | RNTY | |
| 3 months | +3.9% | −2.3% | 9.0% | 3.0% | +6.4 pts | −4.5 pts |
| 6 months | +20.0% | +2.5% | 22.6% | 6.2% | −4.2 pts | −15.6 pts |
| 1 year | +6.6% | +4.6% | 37.4% | 11.9% | −15.2 pts | −12.0 pts |
| 3 years | +61.9% | not published | 87.5% | not published | −36.3 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +58.8% | +7.9% | 89.4% | 15.8% | −96.7 pts | −39.2 pts |
| OARK YieldMax(R) Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly | RNTY YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Real Estate Option Income ETF Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | YieldMax |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 27.9% | 12.5% |
| Expense ratio | 1.00% | 0.99% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 37.4% | 11.9% |
| Price change, 1 year | −34.0% | −7.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.6% | +4.6% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −15.2 pts | −12.0 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 0% | 0% |
| Age | 1395 days | 519 days |
| Net assets | $32m | $6m |
OARK in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OARK paid 37.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 34.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ), used as the innovation proxy returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 15.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 27.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
RNTY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, RNTY paid 11.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.5%, paid monthly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, OARK or RNTY?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OARK paid 37.4% of its starting price in cash and RNTY paid 11.9%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, OARK or RNTY?
- With every distribution reinvested, OARK returned +6.6% and RNTY returned +4.6% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so OARK returned more.
- Which is cheaper, OARK or RNTY?
- OARK charges 1.00% a year and RNTY charges 0.99%, so RNTY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OARK against RNTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/oark-vs-rnty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.