Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GPTY vs XLCI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year GPTY paid 34.0% of its price in cash against XLCI’s 10.9%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF and State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF.

34.0%GPTY cash paid, 1 year
10.9%XLCI cash paid, 1 year
+32.4%GPTY total return, 1 year
+2.2%XLCI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XLCI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

GPTY 37.6XLCI 63.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

GPTY5.7 pts behind XLK · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLK+38.0%GPTY+32.4%34.0% of it arrived as cash5.7 pts behind XLKTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLK+38.0%GPTY+32.4%34.0% as cash5.7 pts behind XLK
XLCI7.9 pts ahead of XLC · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLC−5.7%XLCI+2.2%7.9 pts ahead of XLCTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLC−5.7%XLCI+2.2%7.9 pts ahead of XLC

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GPTY and XLCI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in GPTYOnly in XLCI
Snowflake Inc 6.66%STATE STREET COMMUNICATION SER 99.79%
NVIDIA Corp 6.62%SSI US GOV MONEY MARKET CLASS 0.38%
Alphabet Inc 5.46%STATE STREET COMMUNICATION SER OCT26 117 CALL -0.17%
Palantir Technologies Inc 4.93%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.84%
Apple Inc 4.69%
Microsoft Corp 4.66%
Intel Corp 4.57%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GPTY and XLCI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GPTYXLCIGPTYXLCIGPTYXLCI
3 months−1.3%+3.2%8.2%2.9%−0.5 pts+1.6 pts
6 months+40.4%+2.8%22.2%5.5%−0.1 pts+3.4 pts
1 year+32.4%+2.2%34.0%10.9%−5.7 pts+7.9 pts
Since launch+53.2%+7.3%51.0%12.4%−4.9 pts+1.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GPTY and XLCI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GPTY
YieldMax(R) AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF
Synthetic covered call on XLK, paying weekly
XLCI
State Street(R) Communication Services Select Sector SPDR(R) Premium Income ETF
Covered call on XLC, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxState Street
Strategysynthetic covered callcovered call
BenchmarkTechnology sector (XLK)Communication services (XLC)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized35.3%8.1%
Expense ratio1.06%0.35%
Cash paid, 1 year34.0%10.9%
Price change, 1 year−8.1%−8.8%
Total return, 1 year+32.4%+2.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+38.0%−5.7%
Ahead or behind−5.7 pts+7.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate94%not published
Age603 days415 days
Net assets$126m$3m

GPTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPTY paid 34.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +32.4%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +38.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 35.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

XLCI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XLCI paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.2%. Communication services (XLC) returned −5.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 7.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.1%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, GPTY or XLCI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPTY paid 34.0% of its starting price in cash and XLCI paid 10.9%, so GPTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPTY or XLCI?
With every distribution reinvested, GPTY returned +32.4% and XLCI returned +2.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so GPTY returned more.
Which is cheaper, GPTY or XLCI?
GPTY charges 1.06% a year and XLCI charges 0.35%, so XLCI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GPTY against XLCI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPTY against XLCI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpty-vs-xlci Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources