Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

GPIX vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RYLD paid 12.1% of its price in cash against GPIX’s 8.6%, though GPIX returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GPIX and RYLD

Net assets: $6.5bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF, and $1.3bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF.

At a glance
8.6%
GPIX cash paid, 1 year
12.1%
RYLD cash paid, 1 year
+14.7%
GPIX total return, 1 year
+12.1%
RYLD total return, 1 year
GPIX · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 1.1 pts ahead of SPY
GPIX
+14.7%
SPY
+13.6%

1.1 pts ahead of SPY

GPIX over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price +5.3%, total +14.7%, SPY +13.6%, +1.1 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

SPY

+13.6%

GPIX

+14.7%

8.6% of it arrived as cash

1.1 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.1 pts ahead of SPY

GPIX over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price +5.3%, total +14.7%, SPY +13.6%, +1.1 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

SPY

+13.6%

GPIX

+14.7%

8.6% cash

1.1 pts ahead of SPY

8.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. GPIX over 1 year: paid 8.6%, price +5.3%, total +14.7%, SPY +13.6%, +1.1 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.
RYLD · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 2 pts behind IWM
RYLD
+12.1%
IWM
+14.1%

2 pts behind IWM

RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price −0.6%, total +12.1%, IWM +14.1%, −2.0 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

IWM

+14.1%

RYLD

+12.1%

12.1% of it arrived as cash

2 pts behind IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

2 pts behind IWM

RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price −0.6%, total +12.1%, IWM +14.1%, −2.0 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

IWM

+14.1%

RYLD

+12.1%

12.1% as cash

2 pts behind IWM

12.1% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. RYLD over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price −0.6%, total +12.1%, IWM +14.1%, −2.0 pts. Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Data to Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

GPIX costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.6 points; GPIX is 4.8 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GPIX vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureGPIXRYLD
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+14.7%+12.1%
Price change, 1 yearrose 5.3%fell 0.6%
Return of capital, issuer estimate100% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYRussell 2000, measured through IWM
Against its benchmark, same daysahead by 1.1 ptsbehind by 2.0 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.29%0.60%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$6.2bn$1.3bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · GPIX scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score84.1GPIX57.6RYLD

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

A percentile among the 164 income ETFs not writing on a single company. One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 3, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026 · 155 weekly returns
GPIX RYLD
Return
Total return edge GPIX +72.5% +32.2%
Annualized edge GPIX +20.1% +9.8%
Price return edge GPIX +34.5% −7.8%
Risk
Volatility edge RYLD 12.1% 10.3%
Max drawdown edge RYLD (slight) −15.7% −15.3%
Downside capture 86.9% 62.8%
Beta 0.87 0.54
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GPIX 1.20 0.53
Sortino edge GPIX 1.82 0.70
Treynor 0.168 0.063
Calmar edge GPIX 1.28 0.64
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.3% a year −1.3% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.35 −0.43
Information ratio −0.85 −0.38
Tracking error 2.2% 13.9%

Each against its own benchmark: GPIX against SPY, Nov 3, 2023 to Oct 23, 2026; RYLD against IWM, May 3, 2019 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

GPIX returned more: +72.5% to +32.2%. RYLD swung less: 10.3% to 12.1%. RYLD fell slightly less at its worst: −15.3% to −15.7%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GPIX vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureGPIXRYLDEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+72.5%+32.2%GPIXPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+20.1%+9.8%GPIXTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+34.5%−7.8%GPIXPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility12.1%10.3%RYLDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation8.0%7.8%RYLD (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−15.7%−15.3%RYLD (slight)Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture80.8%33.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture86.9%62.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.870.54Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.990.73Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe1.200.53GPIXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.820.70GPIXReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1680.063Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar1.280.64GPIXAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkSPYIWMThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.3% a year−1.3% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.35−0.43Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−1.3% to +1.8%−7.0% to +4.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.85−0.38Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error2.2%13.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 155 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, GPIX and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GPIX RYLD
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GPIX
NVIDIA CORP 7.31%
APPLE INC 6.45%
ALPHABET INC 4.35%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.89%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.38%
BROADCOM INC 2.79%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 2.02%
TESLA INC 1.88%
Only in RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 ETF 100.94%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
N/A 0.00%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF · Covered call on IWM, paying monthly
Strategy covered call covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Russell 2000 (IWM)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 8.5% 11.5%
Expense ratio 0.29% 0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year 8.6% 12.1%
Price change, 1 year +5.3% −0.6%
Total return, 1 year +14.7% +12.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year +13.6% +14.1%
Ahead or behind +1.1 pts −2.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 100%
Age 3.0 years 7.5 years
Net assets, GPIX as of Oct 27, 2026 and RYLD as of Oct 12, 2026 $6.5bn $1.3bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: GPIX vs RYLD: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowGPIXRYLDGPIXRYLDGPIXRYLD
3 months+5.9%−0.3%2.2%2.9%−0.3 pts+1.9 pts
6 months+9.2%+6.8%4.4%6.2%+0.1 pts+2.9 pts
1 year+14.7%+12.1%8.6%12.1%+1.1 pts−2.1 pts
3 years+84.6%+38.8%31.7%35.9%−10.4 pts−40.5 pts
Since launchNot the same days: GPIX Oct 2023 · RYLD Apr 2019+83.5%+49.0%31.5%68.4%−10.6 pts−50.0 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-4A2FC65428

GPIX and RYLD are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Income paid. GPIX paid 8.6% and RYLD 12.1% (cash paid over 1 year, as a share of its price at the start), a gap of 3.5 points.
  2. What each is measured against. GPIX is measured against S&P 500 through SPY and RYLD against Russell 2000 through IWM.
  3. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GPIX

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GPIX paid 8.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.7%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +13.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.1 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.

RYLD

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, RYLD paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.1%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +14.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.0 pts. At its price on Oct 28, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.5%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, GPIX or RYLD?
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GPIX paid 8.6% of its starting price in cash and RYLD paid 12.1%, so RYLD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIX or RYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, GPIX returned +14.7% and RYLD +12.1% over the year to Oct 28, 2026.
Which is cheaper, GPIX or RYLD?
GPIX charges 0.29% a year and RYLD charges 0.60%, so GPIX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GPIX against RYLD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpix-vs-ryld

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.