Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ISPY vs RYLD: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year RYLD paid 12.3% of its price in cash against ISPY’s 5.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.

ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF, side by side, income ETFs on ETFIQ.

5.7%ISPY cash paid, 1 year
12.3%RYLD cash paid, 1 year
+14.4%ISPY total return, 1 year
+18.1%RYLD total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: ISPY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

ISPY 70.7RYLD 65.73.2, the lowest in this set96.9, the highest

A percentile among the 161 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ISPY3.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
SPY+17.5%ISPY+14.4%5.7% as cash3.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+17.5%ISPY+14.4%3.1 pts behind SPY
RYLD3.1 pts behind IWM · 1 year to Sep 11, 2026
IWM+21.2%RYLD+18.1%12.3% of it arrived as cash3.1 pts behind IWMTotal return, distributions reinvestedIWM+21.2%RYLD+18.1%12.3% cash3.1 pts behind IWM

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ISPY and RYLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in ISPYOnly in RYLD
ProShares GENIUS Money Market ETF 10.56%GLOBAL X RUSSELL 2000 ETF 99.96%
NVIDIA Corp. 7.07%CASH 0.04%
Apple, Inc. 6.31%
Microsoft Corp. 4.60%
Amazon.com, Inc. 3.64%
Alphabet, Inc. 3.05%
Broadcom, Inc. 2.92%
Alphabet, Inc. 2.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ISPY and RYLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ISPYRYLDISPYRYLDISPYRYLD
3 months+1.8%+3.9%1.5%3.1%−1.5 pts+5.1 pts
6 months+12.8%+13.1%3.5%6.3%−3.2 pts−4.5 pts
1 year+14.4%+18.1%5.7%12.3%−3.1 pts−3.1 pts
3 yearsnot published+30.9%not published32.7%not published−31.7 pts
Since launch+53.4%+51.9%25.8%67.2%−14.8 pts−51.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ISPY and RYLD on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ISPY
ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Covered call on IWM, paying monthly
IssuerProSharesGlobal X
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)Russell 2000 (IWM)
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized5.8%12.4%
Expense ratio0.56%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year5.7%12.3%
Price change, 1 year+8.4%+4.7%
Total return, 1 year+14.4%+18.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+17.5%+21.2%
Ahead or behind−3.1 pts−3.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age996 days2699 days

ISPY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, ISPY paid 5.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +17.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.8%, paid monthly.

RYLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, RYLD paid 12.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.1%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +21.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.1 pts. At its price on Sep 11, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.4%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ISPY or RYLD?
Over the year to Sep 11, 2026, ISPY paid 5.7% of its starting price in cash and RYLD paid 12.3%, so RYLD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ISPY or RYLD?
With every distribution reinvested, ISPY returned +14.4% and RYLD returned +18.1% over the year to Sep 11, 2026, so RYLD returned more.
Which is cheaper, ISPY or RYLD?
ISPY charges 0.56% a year and RYLD charges 0.60%, so ISPY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ISPY against RYLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ISPY against RYLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ispy-vs-ryld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources