IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

GPIQ vs QDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTY paid 30.7% of its price in cash against GPIQ’s 10.9%, though GPIQ returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GPIQ and QDTY

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $6.4bn for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF and $37m for YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

GPIQ on its own →QDTY on its own →
At a glance
10.9%
GPIQ cash paid, 1 year
30.7%
QDTY cash paid, 1 year
+13.0%
GPIQ total return, 1 year
+10.1%
QDTY total return, 1 year
GPIQ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 0.7 pts ahead of QQQ
GPIQ
+13.0%
QQQ
+12.3%

0.7 pts ahead of QQQ

GPIQ over 1 year: paid 10.9%, price +1.7%, total +13.0%, QQQ +12.3%, +0.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

GPIQ

+13.0%

10.9% of it arrived as cash

0.7 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.7 pts ahead of QQQ

GPIQ over 1 year: paid 10.9%, price +1.7%, total +13.0%, QQQ +12.3%, +0.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

GPIQ

+13.0%

10.9% as cash

0.7 pts ahead of QQQ

10.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. GPIQ over 1 year: paid 10.9%, price +1.7%, total +13.0%, QQQ +12.3%, +0.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QDTY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 2.2 pts behind QQQ
QDTY
+10.1%
QQQ
+12.3%

2.2 pts behind QQQ

QDTY over 1 year: paid 30.7%, price −21.9%, total +10.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QDTY

+10.1%

30.7% of it arrived as cash

2.2 pts behind QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.2 pts behind QQQ

QDTY over 1 year: paid 30.7%, price −21.9%, total +10.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

QDTY

+10.1%

30.7% as cash

2.2 pts behind QQQ

30.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. QDTY over 1 year: paid 30.7%, price −21.9%, total +10.1%, QQQ +12.3%, −2.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

GPIQ costs 0.88 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.9 points; GPIQ is far larger, $6.4bn against $37m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GPIQ vs QDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureGPIQQDTY
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+13.0%+10.1%
Price change, 1 yearrose 1.7%fell 21.9%
Return of capital, issuer estimate75% of the Nov 5, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNasdaq-100, measured through QQQNasdaq-100, measured through QQQ
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.29%1.17%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$6.4bn$37m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · GPIQ scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score69.8GPIQ27.8QDTY

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and QDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GPIQ QDTY
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GPIQ
NVIDIA CORP 7.47%
APPLE INC 6.59%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.20%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 4.10%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.95%
ALPHABET INC 3.54%
TESLA INC 3.17%
Only in QDTY
NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 95.10%
XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 0.73%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 0.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly QDTY YieldMax Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF · 0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
Issuer Goldman Sachs YieldMax
Strategy covered call 0DTE covered call
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays monthly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 10.5% 30.9%
Expense ratio 0.29% 1.17%
Cash paid, 1 year 10.9% 30.7%
Price change, 1 year +1.7% −21.9%
Total return, 1 year +13.0% +10.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year +12.3% +12.3%
Ahead or behind +0.7 pts −2.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 75%
Age 3.0 years 1.7 years
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $6.4bn $37m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: GPIQ vs QDTY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowGPIQQDTYGPIQQDTYGPIQQDTY
3 months−2.6%−2.6%2.6%7.4%+0.8 pts+0.8 pts
6 months+0.5%+0.6%5.3%15.2%+0.9 pts+1.0 pts
1 year+13.0%+10.1%10.9%30.7%+0.7 pts−2.2 pts
3 years+80.0%–38.3%–−11.4 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: GPIQ Oct 2023 · QDTY Feb 2025+91.4%+21.7%40.7%45.1%−13.4 pts−8.5 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

QDTY flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GPIQ

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GPIQ paid 10.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.7 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.5%, paid monthly.

QDTY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, QDTY paid 30.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 21.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.1%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 75% of the distribution paid Nov 5, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, GPIQ or QDTY?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GPIQ paid 10.9% of its starting price in cash and QDTY paid 30.7%, so QDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIQ or QDTY?
With every distribution reinvested, GPIQ returned +13.0% and QDTY +10.1% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, GPIQ or QDTY?
GPIQ charges 0.29% a year and QDTY charges 1.17%, so GPIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
GPIQ vs QRMIGPIQ vs KIQQGPIQ vs QDTEGPIQ vs QQQIQDTY vs QYLDQDTY vs QQQIQDTY vs JEPQQDTY vs TDAQ
Where to next
Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) →GPIQ on its own →QDTY on its own →GPIQ dividend history →GPIQ holdings →QDTY dividend history →QDTY holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
GPIQ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
GPIQ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Goldman Sachs website ↗
QDTY filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
QDTY prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
QDTY 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
YieldMax page for QDTY ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GPIQ against QDTY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpiq-vs-qdty

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.