Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

QDTY vs QQQI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QDTY paid 30.9% of its price in cash against QQQI’s 15.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF and NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF.

30.9%QDTY cash paid, 1 year
15.2%QQQI cash paid, 1 year
+20.2%QDTY total return, 1 year
+16.4%QQQI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: QQQI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

QDTY 37QQQI 50.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

QDTY1.6 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% of it arrived as cash1.6 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QDTY+20.2%30.9% as cash1.6 pts behind QQQ
QQQI5.3 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QQQI+16.4%15.2% of it arrived as cash5.3 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QQQI+16.4%15.2% as cash5.3 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, QDTY and QQQI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in QDTYOnly in QQQI
NDX 12/18/2026 1001.26 C 96.19%NVIDIA Corp 8.58%
XND 12/18/2026 10.02 C 3.21%Apple Inc 7.79%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.53%Microsoft Corp 5.84%
United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 0.07%Micron Technology Inc 5.03%
Amazon.com Inc 4.36%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.02%
Alphabet Inc 3.24%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.14%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

QDTY and QQQI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
QDTYQQQIQDTYQQQIQDTYQQQI
3 months−0.9%−0.7%7.9%3.4%+1.6 pts+1.8 pts
6 months+20.7%+16.7%17.3%7.7%−3.6 pts−7.5 pts
1 year+20.2%+16.4%30.9%15.2%−1.6 pts−5.3 pts
Since launch+27.1%+59.6%42.0%39.9%−8.5 pts−12.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
QDTY and QQQI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
QDTY
YieldMax(R) Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxNEOS
Strategy0DTE covered calloption income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized25.9%14.0%
Expense ratio1.17%0.68%
Cash paid, 1 year30.9%15.2%
Price change, 1 year−14.0%−0.1%
Total return, 1 year+20.2%+16.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−1.6 pts−5.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate94%98%
Age582 days962 days
Net assets$27m$14.8bn

QDTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 14.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 94% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

QQQI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QQQI paid 15.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Jun 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, QDTY or QQQI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QDTY paid 30.9% of its starting price in cash and QQQI paid 15.2%, so QDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, QDTY or QQQI?
With every distribution reinvested, QDTY returned +20.2% and QQQI returned +16.4% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QDTY returned more.
Which is cheaper, QDTY or QQQI?
QDTY charges 1.17% a year and QQQI charges 0.68%, so QQQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

QDTY against QQQI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, QDTY against QQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/qdty-vs-qqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources