Data as of .
GPIQ vs KIQQ: which paid, and which earned it?
GPIQ and KIQQ both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and KIQQ hold 92% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | GPIQ | KIQQ |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 7.48% | 8.90% |
| APPLE INC | 6.59% | 8.20% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 5.62% | 5.14% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 4.20% | 4.50% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 4.11% | 4.21% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 3.96% | 6.17% |
| ALPHABET INC | 3.54% | 3.40% |
| TESLA INC | 3.17% | 3.19% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 2.78% | 3.31% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.69% | 2.76% |
| INTEL CORP | 3.01% | 2.66% |
| ALPHABET INC | 2.57% | 3.15% |
| Only in GPIQ | Only in KIQQ |
|---|---|
| ELECTRONIC ARTS INC 0.28% | +NDXDBHIO/-FED FUNDS 100.58% |
| KRAFT HEINZ COMPANY (THE) 0.16% | SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 3.07% |
| Cash 0.37% | |
| +NDXDBHIO/-FED FUNDS -107.91% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIQ | KIQQ | GPIQ | KIQQ | GPIQ | KIQQ | |
| 3 months | −1.7% | −3.2% | 2.5% | 1.9% | +0.8 pts | −0.7 pts |
| 6 months | +20.5% | +11.9% | 5.9% | 4.5% | −3.7 pts | −12.3 pts |
| 1 year | +21.4% | not published | 11.0% | not published | −0.4 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +98.3% | +6.0% | 38.2% | 5.8% | −15.0 pts | −9.9 pts |
| GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF Buffer with income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Goldman Sachs | KraneShares |
| Strategy | covered call | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 10.5% | 6.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.0% | 5.8% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +9.3% | −0.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.4% | +6.0% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +15.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.4 pts | −9.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1058 days | 254 days |
| Net assets | $5.8bn | $3m |
GPIQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.5%, paid monthly.
KIQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jan 7, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, KIQQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, GPIQ or KIQQ?
- GPIQ charges 0.29% a year and KIQQ charges 0.79%, so GPIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIQ against KIQQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpiq-vs-kiqq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.