Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GPIQ vs QLDY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QLDY paid 29.2% of its price in cash against GPIQ’s 11.0%, though GPIQ returned more with it reinvested.

Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF and Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread(TM) Income ETF.

11.0%GPIQ cash paid, 1 year
29.2%QLDY cash paid, 1 year
+21.4%GPIQ total return, 1 year
+10.6%QLDY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: GPIQ scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

GPIQ 78.6QLDY 19.13.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

GPIQAbout even with QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%GPIQ+21.4%11.0% of it arrived as cashabout even with QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%GPIQ+21.4%about even with QQQ
QLDY11.2 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%QLDY+10.6%29.2% of it arrived as cash11.2 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%QLDY+10.6%11.2 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GPIQ and QLDY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in GPIQOnly in QLDY
NVIDIA CORP 7.48%Ndx 12/18/2026 2001.44 C 94.80%
APPLE INC 6.59%First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 4.77%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.62%United States Treasury Note/bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 0.53%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.20%Ndxp Us 09/21/26 P29500 0.08%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 4.11%Xnd 12/18/2026 10.44 C 0.05%
MICROSOFT CORP 3.96%Cash & Other -0.06%
ALPHABET INC 3.54%Nasdaq-1 Put Opt 09/26 29650 -0.16%
TESLA INC 3.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GPIQ and QLDY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GPIQQLDYGPIQQLDYGPIQQLDY
3 months−1.7%−6.6%2.5%8.3%+0.8 pts−4.1 pts
6 months+20.5%+20.1%5.9%18.7%−3.7 pts−4.2 pts
1 year+21.4%+10.6%11.0%29.2%−0.4 pts−11.2 pts
Since launch+98.3%+10.6%38.2%29.2%−15.0 pts−11.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GPIQ and QLDY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF
Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly
QLDY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread(TM) Income ETF
Option income on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerGoldman SachsDefiance
Strategycovered calloption income
BenchmarkNasdaq-100 (QQQ)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized10.5%19.6%
Expense ratio0.29%1.04%
Cash paid, 1 year11.0%29.2%
Price change, 1 year+9.3%−20.3%
Total return, 1 year+21.4%+10.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year+21.8%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−0.4 pts−11.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age1058 days365 days
Net assets$5.8bn$52m

GPIQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.4%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.5%, paid monthly.

QLDY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QLDY paid 29.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 20.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.6%, paid weekly. Defiance estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, GPIQ or QLDY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GPIQ paid 11.0% of its starting price in cash and QLDY paid 29.2%, so QLDY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, GPIQ or QLDY?
With every distribution reinvested, GPIQ returned +21.4% and QLDY returned +10.6% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so GPIQ returned more.
Which is cheaper, GPIQ or QLDY?
GPIQ charges 0.29% a year and QLDY charges 1.04%, so GPIQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GPIQ against QLDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GPIQ against QLDY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gpiq-vs-qldy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources