GLDW vs SLVI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
GLDW and SLVI both write options for income. Net assets: $18m on Oct 14, 2026 for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF, and $2m on Oct 13, 2026 for NEOS Silver High Income ETF.
SLVI costs 0.21 points a year less; GLDW is 9.5 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| GLDW | SLVI | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.78% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 13, 2026 | $18m | $2m |
| What it tracks | GLD | SLV |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Price change | fell 25.2% (since Oct 30, 2025) | fell 6.3% (since Oct 7, 2026) |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 14, 2026.
4.7 pts behind GLD
GLDW since launch: paid 25.6%, price −25.2%, total −3.1%, GLD +1.6%, −4.7 pts. Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
GLD
+1.6%
GLDW
−3.1%
4.7 pts behind GLD
Total return, distributions reinvested
4.7 pts behind GLD
GLDW since launch: paid 25.6%, price −25.2%, total −3.1%, GLD +1.6%, −4.7 pts. Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
GLD
+1.6%
GLDW
−3.1%
4.7 pts behind GLD
25.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. GLDW since launch: paid 25.6%, price −25.2%, total −3.1%, GLD +1.6%, −4.7 pts. Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
About even with SLV
SLVI since launch: paid 0.0%, price −6.3%, total −6.3%, SLV −6.7%, +0.4 pts. Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
SLV
−6.7%
SLVI
−6.3%
about even with SLV
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SLV
SLVI since launch: paid 0.0%, price −6.3%, total −6.3%, SLV −6.7%, +0.4 pts. Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
SLV
−6.7%
SLVI
−6.3%
about even with SLV
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SLVI since launch: paid 0.0%, price −6.3%, total −6.3%, SLV −6.7%, +0.4 pts. Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
Figures to Oct 14, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GLDW and SLVI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 14, 2026.
half
0% in common
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GLDW | SLVI | GLDW | SLVI | GLDW | SLVI |
| 3 months | +0.1% | not published | 6.6% | not published | −0.9 pts | not published |
| 6 months | −19.3% | not published | 10.7% | not published | −4.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch Not the same days: GLDW Oct 2025 · SLVI Oct 2026 | −3.1% | −6.3% | 25.6% | 0.0% | −4.7 pts | +0.4 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open this comparison in the app →
On the same fields
As of Oct 14, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid is what the fund distributed over the window, as a share of its price at the start. Payout rate is its latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
About GLDW
Over the period from its first trade on Oct 30, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026, GLDW paid 25.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.1%. Gold (GLD) returned +1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.7 pts. At its price on Oct 14, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.3%, paid weekly.
About SLVI
Over the period from its first trade on Oct 7, 2026 to Oct 14, 2026, SLVI paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −6.3%. Silver (SLV) returned −6.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GLDW against SLVI, data as of Oct 14, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gldw-vs-slvi
ETFIQ. (Oct 14, 2026). GLDW against SLVI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gldw-vs-slvi
[GLDW against SLVI (ETFIQ, Oct 14, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gldw-vs-slvi)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.