Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GLDW vs NUGY: which paid, and which earned it?

GLDW and NUGY both write options for income.

Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF and GraniteShares YieldBOOST Gold Miners ETF.

24.3%GLDW cash paid, 1 year
52.9%NUGY cash paid, 1 year
+5.2%GLDW total return, 1 year
−3.1%NUGY total return, 1 year
GLDW3.2 pts behind GLD · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
GLD+8.4%GLDW+5.2%24.3% as cash3.2 pts behind GLDTotal return, distributions reinvestedGLD+8.4%GLDW+5.2%3.2 pts behind GLD
NUGY30.3 pts behind GDX · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
GDX+27.1%NUGY−3.1%30.3 pts behind GDXTotal return, distributions reinvestedGDX+27.1%NUGY−3.1%30.3 pts behind GDX

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GLDW and NUGY hold 96% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GLDW and NUGY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGLDWNUGY
TREASURY BILL100.00%95.75%
Only in each
Only in GLDWOnly in NUGY
Treasury Bill 4.25%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GLDW and NUGY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GLDWNUGYGLDWNUGYGLDWNUGY
3 months+3.3%−2.3%6.5%14.3%−0.3 pts−18.0 pts
6 months−5.5%−0.5%12.4%31.6%−2.6 pts−19.7 pts
Since launch+5.2%−3.1%24.3%52.9%−3.2 pts−30.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GLDW and NUGY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLDW
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF
Option income on GLD, paying weekly
NUGY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Gold Miners ETF
Synthetic covered call on GDX, paying weekly
IssuerRoundhillGraniteShares
Strategyoption incomesynthetic covered call
BenchmarkGold (GLD)Gold miners (GDX)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized28.4%58.4%
Expense ratio0.99%1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year24.3% (since launch on Oct 30, 2025)52.9% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025)
Price change, 1 year−17.4%−52.4%
Total return, 1 year+5.2% (since launch on Oct 30, 2025)−3.1% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025)
Benchmark return, 1 year+8.4%+27.1%
Ahead or behind−3.2 pts−30.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published96%
Age323 days304 days
Net assets$20m$6m

GLDW in plain words

Over the period since launch on Oct 30, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, GLDW paid 24.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.2%. Gold (GLD) returned +8.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 28.4%, paid weekly.

NUGY in plain words

Over the period since launch on Nov 18, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, NUGY paid 52.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 52.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.1%. Gold miners (GDX) returned +27.1% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 30.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 58.4%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 25, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, GLDW or NUGY?
GLDW charges 0.99% a year and NUGY charges 1.07%, so GLDW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLDW against NUGY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLDW against NUGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gldw-vs-nugy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources