Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
GDXW vs GLDW: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GDXW paid 53.9% of its price in cash against GLDW’s 27.2%, and returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GDXW and GLDW
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $81m for Roundhill Gold Miners WeeklyPay ETF and $18m for Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF.
4.5 pts behind GDX
GDXW over 1 year: paid 53.9%, price −27.7%, total +20.3%, GDX +24.8%, −4.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
GDX
+24.8%
GDXW
+20.3%
53.9% of it arrived as cash
4.5 pts behind GDX
Total return, distributions reinvested
4.5 pts behind GDX
GDXW over 1 year: paid 53.9%, price −27.7%, total +20.3%, GDX +24.8%, −4.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
GDX
+24.8%
GDXW
+20.3%
53.9% as cash
4.5 pts behind GDX
53.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. GDXW over 1 year: paid 53.9%, price −27.7%, total +20.3%, GDX +24.8%, −4.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.4.9 pts behind GLD
GLDW over 1 year: paid 27.2%, price −25.4%, total −2.1%, GLD +2.8%, −4.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
GLD
+2.8%
GLDW
−2.1%
4.9 pts behind GLD
Total return, distributions reinvested
4.9 pts behind GLD
GLDW over 1 year: paid 27.2%, price −25.4%, total −2.1%, GLD +2.8%, −4.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
GLD
+2.8%
GLDW
−2.1%
4.9 pts behind GLD
27.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. GLDW over 1 year: paid 27.2%, price −25.4%, total −2.1%, GLD +2.8%, −4.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.99% a year; their one-year returns differ by 22.4 points; GDXW is 4.5 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | GDXW | GLDW |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +20.3% | −2.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 27.7% | fell 25.4% |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Gold miners, measured through GDX | Gold, measured through GLD |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.99% | 0.99% |
| Net assets | $81m | $18m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Nov 7, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 51 weekly returnsFrom Nov 2025 to Oct 2026, GDXW returned more: +0.8% to −8.8%. GLDW fell less at its worst: −33.1% to −46.2%.
Full scorecard
3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | GDXW | GLDW | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +0.8% | −8.8% | GDXW | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Price return | −39.1% | −30.3% | GLDW | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Max drawdown | −46.2% | −33.1% | GLDW | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 51 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GDXW and GLDW hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
0% in common
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GDXW | GLDW | GDXW | GLDW | GDXW | GLDW |
| 3 months | −0.6% | −6.5% | 12.6% | 6.1% | −1.7 pts | −2.1 pts |
| 6 months | −13.0% | −18.2% | 19.7% | 10.4% | −4.5 pts | −4.6 pts |
| 1 year | +20.3% | −2.1% | 53.9% | 27.2% | −4.4 pts | −4.9 pts |
| Since launchGDXW Oct 2025 · GLDW Oct 2025 | +11.0% | −4.5% | 49.7% | 26.5% | −5.9 pts | −5.2 pts |
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
GDXW
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GDXW paid 53.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 27.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +20.3%. Gold miners (GDX) returned +24.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.5 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 26.0%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 3, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
GLDW
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GLDW paid 27.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.1%. Gold (GLD) returned +2.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid weekly.
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GDXW against GLDW, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gdxw-vs-gldw
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). GDXW against GLDW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gdxw-vs-gldw
[GDXW against GLDW (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gdxw-vs-gldw)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.