Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GLDW vs IGLD: which paid, and which earned it?

GLDW and IGLD both write options for income.

Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF and FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF.

24.3%GLDW cash paid, 1 year
21.6%IGLD cash paid, 1 year
+5.2%GLDW total return, 1 year
+13.3%IGLD total return, 1 year
GLDW3.2 pts behind GLD · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
GLD+8.4%GLDW+5.2%24.3% as cash3.2 pts behind GLDTotal return, distributions reinvestedGLD+8.4%GLDW+5.2%3.2 pts behind GLD
IGLD6.2 pts behind GLD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
GLD+19.5%IGLD+13.3%21.6% of it arrived as cash6.2 pts behind GLDTotal return, distributions reinvestedGLD+19.5%IGLD+13.3%21.6% as cash6.2 pts behind GLD

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GLDW and IGLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in GLDWOnly in IGLD
TREASURY BILL 100.00%U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 11/27/2026 143.25%
US Dollar 0.49%
2026-11-30 SPDR® Gold Trust C 581.82 0.10%
2026-09-30 SPDR® Gold Trust C 408.42 -0.17%
2026-11-30 SPDR® Gold Trust P 581.82 -43.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GLDW and IGLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GLDWIGLDGLDWIGLDGLDWIGLD
3 months+3.3%+2.4%6.5%5.7%−0.3 pts−1.3 pts
6 months−5.5%−2.2%12.4%10.7%−2.6 pts+0.8 pts
1 yearnot published+13.3%not published21.6%not published−6.2 pts
3 yearsnot published+81.5%not published55.3%not published−42.4 pts
Since launch+5.2%+94.5%24.3%64.5%−3.2 pts−55.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GLDW and IGLD on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLDW
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF
Option income on GLD, paying weekly
IGLD
FT Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF
Option income on GLD, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillFirst Trust
Strategyoption incomeoption income
BenchmarkGold (GLD)Gold (GLD)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized28.4%22.5%
Expense ratio0.99%0.85%
Cash paid, 1 year24.3% (since launch on Oct 30, 2025)21.6%
Price change, 1 year−17.4%−7.9%
Total return, 1 year+5.2% (since launch on Oct 30, 2025)+13.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year+8.4%+19.5%
Ahead or behind−3.2 pts−6.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age323 days2025 days
Net assets$20m$612m

GLDW in plain words

Over the period since launch on Oct 30, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, GLDW paid 24.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.2%. Gold (GLD) returned +8.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 28.4%, paid weekly.

IGLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, IGLD paid 21.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 7.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.3%. Gold (GLD) returned +19.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 22.5%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, GLDW or IGLD?
GLDW charges 0.99% a year and IGLD charges 0.85%, so IGLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLDW against IGLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLDW against IGLD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gldw-vs-igld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources