Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GLDW vs KSLV: which paid, and which earned it?

GLDW and KSLV both write options for income.

Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF and Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF.

24.3%GLDW cash paid, 1 year
30.9%KSLV cash paid, 1 year
+5.2%GLDW total return, 1 year
+34.9%KSLV total return, 1 year
GLDW3.2 pts behind GLD · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
GLD+8.4%GLDW+5.2%3.2 pts behind GLDTotal return, distributions reinvestedGLD+8.4%GLDW+5.2%3.2 pts behind GLD
KSLV6.6 pts behind SLV · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SLV+41.4%KSLV+34.9%30.9% of it arrived as cash6.6 pts behind SLVTotal return, distributions reinvestedSLV+41.4%KSLV+34.9%30.9% as cash6.6 pts behind SLV

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GLDW and KSLV hold 44% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GLDW and KSLV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGLDWKSLV
TREASURY BILL100.00%43.78%
Only in each
Only in GLDWOnly in KSLV
TREASURY BILL 28.36%
TREASURY BILL 27.87%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GLDW and KSLV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GLDWKSLVGLDWKSLVGLDWKSLV
3 months+3.3%0.0%6.5%6.4%−0.3 pts−0.7 pts
6 months−5.5%−4.3%12.4%12.4%−2.6 pts−1.7 pts
Since launch+5.2%+34.9%24.3%30.9%−3.2 pts−6.6 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GLDW and KSLV on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLDW
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF
Option income on GLD, paying weekly
KSLV
Kurv Silver Enhanced Income ETF
Covered call on SLV, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillKurv
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkGold (GLD)Silver (SLV)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized28.4%27.4%
Expense ratio0.99%1.00%
Cash paid, 1 year24.3% (since launch on Oct 30, 2025)30.9% (since launch on Sep 30, 2025)
Price change, 1 year−17.4%+5.4%
Total return, 1 year+5.2% (since launch on Oct 30, 2025)+34.9% (since launch on Sep 30, 2025)
Benchmark return, 1 year+8.4%+41.4%
Ahead or behind−3.2 pts−6.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published91%
Age323 days353 days
Net assets$20m$122m

GLDW in plain words

Over the period since launch on Oct 30, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, GLDW paid 24.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.2%. Gold (GLD) returned +8.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 28.4%, paid weekly.

KSLV in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 30, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, KSLV paid 30.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +34.9%. Silver (SLV) returned +41.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 27.4%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 91% of the distribution paid Aug 20, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, GLDW or KSLV?
GLDW charges 0.99% a year and KSLV charges 1.00%, so GLDW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLDW against KSLV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLDW against KSLV, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gldw-vs-kslv Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources