Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GLDW vs KGLD: which paid, and which earned it?

GLDW and KGLD both write options for income.

Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF and Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF.

24.3%GLDW cash paid, 1 year
16.0%KGLD cash paid, 1 year
+5.2%GLDW total return, 1 year
+18.9%KGLD total return, 1 year
GLDW3.2 pts behind GLD · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
GLD+8.4%GLDW+5.2%24.3% as cash3.2 pts behind GLDTotal return, distributions reinvestedGLD+8.4%GLDW+5.2%3.2 pts behind GLD
KGLD0.6 pts behind GLD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
GLD+19.5%KGLD+18.9%16.0% of it arrived as cash0.6 pts behind GLDTotal return, distributions reinvestedGLD+19.5%KGLD+18.9%16.0% as cash0.6 pts behind GLD

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GLDW and KGLD hold 41% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions GLDW and KGLD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingGLDWKGLD
TREASURY BILL100.00%41.06%
Only in each
Only in GLDWOnly in KGLD
TREASURY BILL 40.22%
TREASURY BILL 18.71%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GLDW and KGLD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GLDWKGLDGLDWKGLDGLDWKGLD
3 months+3.3%+2.9%6.5%3.8%−0.3 pts−0.8 pts
6 months−5.5%−4.7%12.4%7.4%−2.6 pts−1.8 pts
1 yearnot published+18.9%not published16.0%not published−0.6 pts
Since launch+5.2%+29.8%24.3%19.2%−3.2 pts−2.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GLDW and KGLD on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLDW
Roundhill Gold WeeklyPay ETF
Option income on GLD, paying weekly
KGLD
Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF
Covered call on GLD, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillKurv
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkGold (GLD)Gold (GLD)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized28.4%15.3%
Expense ratio0.99%1.00%
Cash paid, 1 year24.3% (since launch on Oct 30, 2025)16.0%
Price change, 1 year−17.4%+3.4%
Total return, 1 year+5.2% (since launch on Oct 30, 2025)+18.9%
Benchmark return, 1 year+8.4%+19.5%
Ahead or behind−3.2 pts−0.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published86%
Age323 days437 days
Net assets$20m$163m

GLDW in plain words

Over the period since launch on Oct 30, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, GLDW paid 24.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.2%. Gold (GLD) returned +8.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 28.4%, paid weekly.

KGLD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, KGLD paid 16.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.9%. Gold (GLD) returned +19.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly. Kurv estimates that 86% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, GLDW or KGLD?
GLDW charges 0.99% a year and KGLD charges 1.00%, so GLDW is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GLDW against KGLD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GLDW against KGLD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gldw-vs-kgld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources