Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GDXW vs SLJY: which paid, and which earned it?

GDXW and SLJY both write options for income.

Roundhill Gold Miners WeeklyPay ETF and Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF.

45.4%GDXW cash paid, 1 year
25.9%SLJY cash paid, 1 year
+29.6%GDXW total return, 1 year
+40.0%SLJY total return, 1 year
GDXW2.3 pts behind GDX · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
GDX+31.9%GDXW+29.6%45.4% of it arrived as cash2.3 pts behind GDXTotal return, distributions reinvestedGDX+31.9%GDXW+29.6%45.4% cash2.3 pts behind GDX
SLJY13.2 pts behind SILJ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SILJ+53.2%SLJY+40.0%25.9% of it arrived as cash13.2 pts behind SILJTotal return, distributions reinvestedSILJ+53.2%SLJY+40.0%13.2 pts behind SILJ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GDXW and SLJY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in GDXWOnly in SLJY
TREASURY BILL 100.00%Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF 24.33%
Hecla Mining Co 6.90%
First Majestic Silver Corp 6.43%
COEUR MINING INC. 6.01%
United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 5.30%
Skeena Resources Ltd 4.48%
Endeavour Silver Corp 4.40%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 4.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GDXW and SLJY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GDXWSLJYGDXWSLJYGDXWSLJY
3 months+17.0%+9.2%12.6%5.8%+1.3 pts+1.1 pts
6 months+19.4%+15.2%24.9%12.3%+0.2 pts+0.4 pts
1 yearnot published+40.0%not published25.9%not published−13.2 pts
Since launch+29.6%+57.3%45.4%29.1%−2.3 pts−32.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GDXW and SLJY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GDXW
Roundhill Gold Miners WeeklyPay ETF
Option income on GDX, paying weekly
SLJY
Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF
Covered call on SILJ, paying monthly
IssuerRoundhillAmplify
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkGold miners (GDX)Junior silver miners (SILJ)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized56.2%23.4%
Expense ratio0.99%not published
Cash paid, 1 year45.4% (since launch on Oct 30, 2025)25.9%
Price change, 1 year−17.3%+12.3%
Total return, 1 year+29.6% (since launch on Oct 30, 2025)+40.0%
Benchmark return, 1 year+31.9%+53.2%
Ahead or behind−2.3 pts−13.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age323 days395 days
Net assets$84m$78m

GDXW in plain words

Over the period since launch on Oct 30, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, GDXW paid 45.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 17.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +29.6%. Gold miners (GDX) returned +31.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 56.2%, paid weekly.

SLJY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SLJY paid 25.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +40.0%. Junior silver miners (SILJ) returned +53.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 23.4%, paid monthly.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GDXW against SLJY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GDXW against SLJY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gdxw-vs-sljy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources