Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

GDXY vs SLJY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year GDXY paid 50.1% of its price in cash against SLJY’s 25.9%, though SLJY returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF and Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF.

50.1%GDXY cash paid, 1 year
25.9%SLJY cash paid, 1 year
+18.4%GDXY total return, 1 year
+40.0%SLJY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SLJY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

GDXY 7.5SLJY 53.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

GDXY21.4 pts behind GDX · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
GDX+39.8%GDXY+18.4%50.1% of it arrived as cash21.4 pts behind GDXTotal return, distributions reinvestedGDX+39.8%GDXY+18.4%21.4 pts behind GDX
SLJY13.2 pts behind SILJ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SILJ+53.2%SLJY+40.0%25.9% of it arrived as cash13.2 pts behind SILJTotal return, distributions reinvestedSILJ+53.2%SLJY+40.0%13.2 pts behind SILJ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GDXY and SLJY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in GDXYOnly in SLJY
TREASURY BILL 26.25%Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF 24.33%
TREASURY BILL 23.92%Hecla Mining Co 6.90%
TREASURY BILL 21.01%First Majestic Silver Corp 6.43%
TREASURY BILL 16.74%COEUR MINING INC. 6.01%
TREASURY BILL 12.07%United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 5.30%
Skeena Resources Ltd 4.48%
Endeavour Silver Corp 4.40%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 4.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

GDXY and SLJY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
GDXYSLJYGDXYSLJYGDXYSLJY
3 months+13.5%+9.2%13.8%5.8%−2.2 pts+1.1 pts
6 months+13.0%+15.2%25.4%12.3%−6.2 pts+0.4 pts
1 year+18.4%+40.0%50.1%25.9%−21.4 pts−13.2 pts
Since launch+68.9%+57.3%86.5%29.1%−94.5 pts−32.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
GDXY and SLJY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GDXY
YieldMax(R) Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on GDX, paying weekly
SLJY
Amplify SILJ Covered Call ETF
Covered call on SILJ, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxAmplify
Strategysynthetic covered callcovered call
BenchmarkGold miners (GDX)Junior silver miners (SILJ)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized50.0%23.4%
Expense ratio1.00%not published
Cash paid, 1 year50.1%25.9%
Price change, 1 year−33.1%+12.3%
Total return, 1 year+18.4%+40.0%
Benchmark return, 1 year+39.8%+53.2%
Ahead or behind−21.4 pts−13.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate95%not published
Age850 days395 days
Net assets$329m$78m

GDXY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GDXY paid 50.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 33.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.4%. Gold miners (GDX) returned +39.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 21.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 50.0%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

SLJY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SLJY paid 25.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +40.0%. Junior silver miners (SILJ) returned +53.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 13.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 23.4%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, GDXY or SLJY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, GDXY paid 50.1% of its starting price in cash and SLJY paid 25.9%, so GDXY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, GDXY or SLJY?
With every distribution reinvested, GDXY returned +18.4% and SLJY returned +40.0% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so SLJY returned more.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

GDXY against SLJY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, GDXY against SLJY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gdxy-vs-sljy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources