Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
GDXY vs SLJY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GDXY paid 48.8% of its price in cash against SLJY’s 27.5%, though SLJY returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about GDXY and SLJY
Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $257m for YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF and $63m for Amplify SILJ Junior Silver Miners Covered Call ETF.
17.7 pts behind GDX
GDXY over 1 year: paid 48.8%, price −37.3%, total +7.1%, GDX +24.8%, −17.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
GDX
+24.8%
GDXY
+7.1%
48.8% as cash
17.7 pts behind GDX
Total return, distributions reinvested
17.7 pts behind GDX
GDXY over 1 year: paid 48.8%, price −37.3%, total +7.1%, GDX +24.8%, −17.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
GDX
+24.8%
GDXY
+7.1%
17.7 pts behind GDX
48.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. GDXY over 1 year: paid 48.8%, price −37.3%, total +7.1%, GDX +24.8%, −17.7 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.1 pt behind SILJ
SLJY over 1 year: paid 27.5%, price −5.4%, total +18.6%, SILJ +19.6%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SILJ
+19.6%
SLJY
+18.6%
27.5% of it arrived as cash
1 pt behind SILJ
Total return, distributions reinvested
1 pt behind SILJ
SLJY over 1 year: paid 27.5%, price −5.4%, total +18.6%, SILJ +19.6%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SILJ
+19.6%
SLJY
+18.6%
27.5% as cash
1 pt behind SILJ
27.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. SLJY over 1 year: paid 27.5%, price −5.4%, total +18.6%, SILJ +19.6%, −1.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
SLJY costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.5 points; GDXY is 4.1 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | GDXY | SLJY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +7.1% | +18.6% |
| Price change, 1 year | fell 37.3% | fell 5.4% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 92% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment | 100% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Gold miners, measured through GDX | Junior silver miners, measured through SILJ |
| Against its benchmark, same days | behind by 17.7 pts | behind by 1.0 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 1.00% | 0.76% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $257m | $63m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 1% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
Risk and return
Aug 29, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026 · 61 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: GDXY against GDX, May 31, 2024 to Oct 30, 2026; SLJY against SILJ, Aug 29, 2025 to Oct 30, 2026.
From Aug 2025 to Oct 2026, SLJY returned more: +10.0% to +4.6%. GDXY swung less: 40.6% to 47.3%. GDXY fell slightly less at its worst: −36.8% to −37.9%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | GDXY | SLJY | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +4.6% | +10.0% | SLJY | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +3.9% | +8.5% | SLJY | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | −45.7% | −15.1% | SLJY | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 40.6% | 47.3% | GDXY | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 28.4% | 32.9% | GDXY | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −36.8% | −37.9% | GDXY (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 44.0% | 45.7% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 93.3% | 97.1% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.76 | 0.80 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.97 | 0.97 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.20 | 0.33 | SLJY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.29 | 0.47 | SLJY | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.224 | 0.193 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.11 | 0.22 | SLJY | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | GDX | SILJ | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −11.9% a year | −10.6% a year | SLJY not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −2.95 | −1.33 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −19.9% to −3.9% | −26.7% to +5.4% | SLJY includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −1.75 | −1.19 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 11.9% | 14.4% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 61 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, GDXY and SLJY hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.
half
1% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GDXY | SLJY | GDXY | SLJY | GDXY | SLJY |
| 3 months | +0.6% | −10.0% | 14.0% | 5.6% | −0.5 pts | +2.0 pts |
| 6 months | −10.0% | −17.2% | 20.7% | 10.2% | −1.5 pts | +4.2 pts |
| 1 year | +7.1% | +18.6% | 48.8% | 27.5% | −17.6 pts | −1.0 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: GDXY May 2024 · SLJY Aug 2025 | +50.9% | +30.8% | 88.8% | 33.2% | −82.4 pts | −22.3 pts |
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
GDXY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, GDXY paid 48.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 37.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.1%. Gold miners (GDX) returned +24.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 17.7 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 38.1%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 92% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
SLJY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SLJY paid 27.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. Junior silver miners (SILJ) returned +19.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 22.6%, paid monthly. Amplify estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GDXY against SLJY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gdxy-vs-sljy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). GDXY against SLJY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gdxy-vs-sljy
[GDXY against SLJY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/gdxy-vs-sljy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.