Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

FGSI vs JULJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FGSI paid 8.3% of its price in cash against JULJ’s 5.6%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FGSI and JULJ

Net assets: $2.0m on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF, and $14m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July.

At a glance
8.3%
FGSI cash paid, 1 year
5.6%
JULJ cash paid, 1 year
+9.0%
FGSI total return, 1 year
+5.4%
JULJ total return, 1 year
FGSI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 About even with FTGS
FGSI
+9.0%
FTGS
+8.8%

About even with FTGS

FGSI over 1 year: paid 8.3%, price +0.2%, total +9.0%, FTGS +8.8%, +0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FTGS

+8.8%

FGSI

+9.0%

8.3% of it arrived as cash

about even with FTGS

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with FTGS

FGSI over 1 year: paid 8.3%, price +0.2%, total +9.0%, FTGS +8.8%, +0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

FTGS

+8.8%

FGSI

+9.0%

8.3% cash

about even with FTGS

8.3% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. FGSI over 1 year: paid 8.3%, price +0.2%, total +9.0%, FTGS +8.8%, +0.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
JULJ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.4 pts behind SPY
JULJ
+5.4%
SPY
+14.8%

9.4 pts behind SPY

JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULJ

+5.4%

5.6% of it arrived as cash

9.4 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.4 pts behind SPY

JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULJ

+5.4%

9.4 pts behind SPY

5.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

JULJ costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.6 points; JULJ is 7.0 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FGSI vs JULJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureFGSIJULJ
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+9.0%+5.4%
Price change, 1 yearrose 0.2%fell 0.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate53% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment39% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkFirst Trust Growth Strength ETF, measured through FTGSS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.85%0.79%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$2.0m$14m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · FGSI scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score63.2FGSI54.2JULJ

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FGSI and JULJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FGSI JULJ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FGSI
Vertiv Holdings Co (Class A) 2.28%
Eli Lilly and Company 2.25%
United Therapeutics Corporation 2.25%
Blackstone Inc. 2.21%
Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2.20%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 2.18%
General Dynamics Corporation 2.16%
S&P Global Inc. 2.16%
Only in JULJ
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FGSI FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF · Writes calls on the S&P 500, measured against The Growth Strength Index, paying monthly JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
Strategy option income defined income
Benchmark First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays monthly quarterly
Payout rate, annualized 8.3% 5.4%
Expense ratio 0.85% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 8.3% 5.6%
Price change, 1 year +0.2% −0.4%
Total return, 1 year +9.0% +5.4%
Benchmark return, 1 year +8.8% +14.8%
Ahead or behind +0.2 pts −9.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 53% 39%
Age 1.4 years 3.3 years
Net assets, FGSI as of Nov 3, 2026 and JULJ as of Nov 4, 2026 $2.0m $14m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: FGSI vs JULJ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowFGSIJULJFGSIJULJFGSIJULJ
3 months−2.2%+1.3%2.0%1.3%+0.6 pts+1.5 pts
6 months+6.3%+2.6%4.3%2.7%+0.2 pts−2.4 pts
1 year+9.0%+5.4%8.3%5.6%+0.2 pts−9.4 pts
3 years–+18.6%–17.3%–−64.3 pts
Since launchNot the same days: FGSI Jun 2025 · JULJ Jul 2023+13.6%+21.3%11.3%19.0%−0.7 pts−58.5 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

FGSI and JULJ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FGSI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FGSI paid 8.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.0%. First Trust Growth Strength ETF (FTGS) returned +8.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.3%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 53% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

JULJ

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULJ paid 5.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.4%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 39% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FGSI or JULJ?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FGSI paid 8.3% of its starting price in cash and JULJ paid 5.6%, so FGSI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FGSI or JULJ?
With every distribution reinvested, FGSI returned +9.0% and JULJ +5.4% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, FGSI or JULJ?
FGSI charges 0.85% a year and JULJ charges 0.79%, so JULJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FGSI against JULJ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fgsi-vs-julj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.