Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
JULJ vs KIQQ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
JULJ and KIQQ both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about JULJ and KIQQ
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $14m for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July and $2.4m for KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF.
9.4 pts behind SPY
JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
JULJ
+5.4%
5.6% of it arrived as cash
9.4 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
9.4 pts behind SPY
JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
JULJ
+5.4%
9.4 pts behind SPY
5.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.10.4 pts behind QQQ
KIQQ since launch: paid 6.9%, price −6.0%, total +0.9%, QQQ +11.3%, −10.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+11.3%
KIQQ
+0.9%
10.4 pts behind QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
10.4 pts behind QQQ
KIQQ since launch: paid 6.9%, price −6.0%, total +0.9%, QQQ +11.3%, −10.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
QQQ
+11.3%
KIQQ
+0.9%
10.4 pts behind QQQ
6.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. KIQQ since launch: paid 6.9%, price −6.0%, total +0.9%, QQQ +11.3%, −10.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.79% a year; JULJ is 5.8 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | JULJ | KIQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +5.4% | not published |
| Price change | fell 0.4% (1 year) | fell 6.0% (since Jan 7, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 39% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment | 99% of the Sep 30, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | S&P 500, measured through SPY | Nasdaq-100, measured through QQQ |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $14m | $2.4m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, JULJ and KIQQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | JULJ | KIQQ | JULJ | KIQQ | JULJ | KIQQ |
| 3 months | +1.3% | −3.7% | 1.3% | 1.7% | +1.5 pts | −0.2 pts |
| 6 months | +2.6% | −4.4% | 2.7% | 3.7% | −2.4 pts | −4.0 pts |
| 1 year | +5.4% | – | 5.6% | – | −9.4 pts | – |
| 3 years | +18.6% | – | 17.3% | – | −64.3 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: JULJ Jul 2023 · KIQQ Jan 2026 | +21.3% | +0.9% | 19.0% | 6.9% | −58.5 pts | −10.4 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
JULJ
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULJ paid 5.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.4%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 39% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
KIQQ
Over the period from its first trade on Jan 7, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, KIQQ paid 6.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.9%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +11.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.5%, paid monthly. KraneShares estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JULJ against KIQQ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julj-vs-kiqq
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). JULJ against KIQQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julj-vs-kiqq
[JULJ against KIQQ (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julj-vs-kiqq)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.