Data as of .
KIQQ vs TPRY: which paid, and which earned it?
KIQQ and TPRY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KIQQ and TPRY hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | KIQQ | TPRY |
|---|---|---|
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 5.14% | 13.23% |
| APPLE INC | 8.20% | 4.91% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 4.50% | 12.40% |
| NVIDIA CORP | 8.90% | 4.39% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 4.21% | 3.70% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.31% | 5.35% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL C | 3.15% | 6.91% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORP | 1.58% | 4.08% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.76% | 1.49% |
| QUALCOMM INC | 0.89% | 1.38% |
| ASML HOLDING NV-NY REG SHS | 0.74% | 2.63% |
| COREWEAVE INC-CL A | 0.17% | 2.71% |
| Only in KIQQ | Only in TPRY |
|---|---|
| +NDXDBHIO/-FED FUNDS 100.58% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 8.48% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 6.17% | Uber Technologies Inc 5.23% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.40% | Vistra Corp 4.57% |
| TESLA INC 3.19% | Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 4.46% |
| SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 3.07% | Boeing Co/The 4.30% |
| INTEL CORP 2.66% | NRG Energy Inc 4.18% |
| WALMART INC 2.37% | Baidu Inc 3.72% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.00% | American Airlines Group Inc 3.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIQQ | TPRY | KIQQ | TPRY | KIQQ | TPRY | |
| 3 months | −3.2% | −5.9% | 1.9% | 3.5% | −0.7 pts | −8.2 pts |
| 6 months | +11.9% | +11.9% | 4.5% | 8.1% | −12.3 pts | −6.1 pts |
| Since launch | +6.0% | +2.1% | 5.8% | 7.4% | −9.9 pts | −9.3 pts |
| KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF Buffer with income on QQQ, paying monthly | TPRY VistaShares Target 15 TEPRTantrum Contrarian Distribution ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | KraneShares | VistaShares |
| Strategy | buffer with income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.3% | 15.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.95% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 5.8% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) | 7.4% (since launch on Feb 26, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.1% | −5.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.0% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) | +2.1% (since launch on Feb 26, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +15.9% | +11.4% |
| Ahead or behind | −9.9 pts | −9.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 254 days | 204 days |
| Net assets | $3m | $4m |
KIQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jan 7, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, KIQQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.
TPRY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 26, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, TPRY paid 7.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 5.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +2.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +11.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, KIQQ or TPRY?
- KIQQ charges 0.79% a year and TPRY charges 0.95%, so KIQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KIQQ against TPRY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kiqq-vs-tpry Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.