Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FGSI vs JULH: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year FGSI paid 8.1% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.

FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July.

8.1%FGSI cash paid, 1 year
4.7%JULH cash paid, 1 year
+5.3%FGSI total return, 1 year
+4.5%JULH total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: JULH scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

FGSI 33JULH 35.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FGSI11.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%FGSI+5.3%8.1% of it arrived as cash11.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%FGSI+5.3%11.3 pts behind SPY
JULH12.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JULH+4.5%4.7% as cash12.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JULH+4.5%12.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FGSI and JULH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in FGSIOnly in JULH
Newmont Corporation 2.70%TREASURY BILL 100.00%
Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 2.63%
Marvell Technology, Inc. 2.53%
Microsoft Corporation 2.45%
Arista Networks, Inc. 2.32%
DexCom, Inc. 2.28%
Intuitive Surgical, Inc. 2.22%
Target Corporation 2.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FGSI and JULH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FGSIJULHFGSIJULHFGSIJULH
3 months+2.4%+1.8%2.1%1.1%+0.2 pts−0.4 pts
6 months+10.0%+4.0%4.4%2.7%−8.0 pts−14.0 pts
1 year+5.3%+4.5%8.1%4.7%−11.3 pts−12.1 pts
3 yearsnot published+20.7%not published18.4%not published−57.7 pts
Since launch+11.9%+22.7%9.8%18.6%−14.3 pts−55.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FGSI and JULH on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FGSI
FT Vest Growth Strength & Target Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
JULH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerFirst TrustInnovator
Strategyoption incomedefined income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized8.6%4.2%
Expense ratio0.85%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year8.1%4.7%
Price change, 1 year−3.2%−0.4%
Total return, 1 year+5.3%+4.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−11.3 pts−12.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age449 days1173 days
Net assets$2m$17m

FGSI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FGSI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.6%, paid monthly.

JULH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.2%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FGSI or JULH?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FGSI paid 8.1% of its starting price in cash and JULH paid 4.7%, so FGSI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FGSI or JULH?
With every distribution reinvested, FGSI returned +5.3% and JULH returned +4.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so FGSI returned more.
Which is cheaper, FGSI or JULH?
FGSI charges 0.85% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so JULH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FGSI against JULH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FGSI against JULH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fgsi-vs-julh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources