Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

JULH vs SDTY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year SDTY paid 24.4% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July and YieldMax(R) S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF.

4.7%JULH cash paid, 1 year
24.4%SDTY cash paid, 1 year
+4.5%JULH total return, 1 year
+15.8%SDTY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SDTY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

JULH 35.9SDTY 43.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

JULH12.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JULH+4.5%4.7% as cash12.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JULH+4.5%12.1 pts behind SPY
SDTY0.8 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%SDTY+15.8%24.4% of it arrived as cash0.8 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%SDTY+15.8%24.4% as cash0.8 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JULH and SDTY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in JULHOnly in SDTY
TREASURY BILL 100.00%SPX 12/18/2026 1200.26 C 88.32%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 8.93%
United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 2.55%
United States Treasury Bill 02/18/2027 0.10%
United States Treasury Bill 07/08/2027 0.09%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

JULH and SDTY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
JULHSDTYJULHSDTYJULHSDTY
3 months+1.8%+3.2%1.1%5.9%−0.4 pts+1.0 pts
6 months+4.0%+16.5%2.7%13.7%−14.0 pts−1.6 pts
1 year+4.5%+15.8%4.7%24.4%−12.1 pts−0.8 pts
3 years+20.7%not published18.4%not published−57.7 ptsnot published
Since launch+22.7%+22.3%18.6%35.4%−55.9 pts−5.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
JULH and SDTY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JULH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
SDTY
YieldMax(R) S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
0DTE covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerInnovatorYieldMax
Strategydefined income0DTE covered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysquarterlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized4.2%19.8%
Expense ratio0.79%1.08%
Cash paid, 1 year4.7%24.4%
Price change, 1 year−0.4%−10.8%
Total return, 1 year+4.5%+15.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−12.1 pts−0.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published100%
Age1173 days589 days
Net assets$17m$28m

JULH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.2%, paid quarterly.

SDTY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SDTY paid 24.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +15.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.8%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JULH or SDTY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting price in cash and SDTY paid 24.4%, so SDTY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JULH or SDTY?
With every distribution reinvested, JULH returned +4.5% and SDTY returned +15.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so SDTY returned more.
Which is cheaper, JULH or SDTY?
JULH charges 0.79% a year and SDTY charges 1.08%, so JULH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

JULH against SDTY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, JULH against SDTY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-sdty Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources