IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

JULH vs OARK: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OARK paid 33.3% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.8%, though JULH returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about JULH and OARK

Net assets: $18m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July, and $38m on Nov 3, 2026 for YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF.

JULH on its own →OARK on its own →
At a glance
4.8%
JULH cash paid, 1 year
33.3%
OARK cash paid, 1 year
+4.9%
JULH total return, 1 year
−2.6%
OARK total return, 1 year
JULH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.9 pts behind SPY
JULH
+4.9%
SPY
+14.8%

9.9 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULH

+4.9%

4.8% as cash

9.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.9 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULH

+4.9%

9.9 pts behind SPY

4.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
OARK · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.1 pts ahead of ARKK
OARK
−2.6%
ARKK
−3.7%

1.1 pts ahead of ARKK

OARK over 1 year: paid 33.3%, price −36.6%, total −2.6%, ARKK −3.7%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

ARKK

−3.7%

OARK

−2.6%

1.1 pts ahead of ARKK

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.1 pts ahead of ARKK

OARK over 1 year: paid 33.3%, price −36.6%, total −2.6%, ARKK −3.7%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

ARKK

−3.7%

OARK

−2.6%

1.1 pts ahead of ARKK

33.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. OARK over 1 year: paid 33.3%, price −36.6%, total −2.6%, ARKK −3.7%, +1.1 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

JULH costs 0.21 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.5 points; OARK is 2.2 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

JULH vs OARK: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureJULHOARK
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+4.9%−2.6%
Price change, 1 yearfell 0.0%fell 36.6%
Return of capital, issuer estimate51% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYARK Innovation ETF, measured through ARKK
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%1.00%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$17m$38m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · JULH scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score58.4JULH15.3OARK

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, JULH and OARK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first JULH OARK
Only in one fund ↓
Only in JULH
Only in OARK
United States Treasury Note/Bond 3.375% 09/15/2027 31.70%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 25.99%
2ARKK US 11/20/26 C85.01 FLX 1.48%
ARKK US 11/06/26 C83 0.25%
ARKK US 11/06/26 C84 0.07%
ARKK US 11/06/26 C82 -0.16%
ARKK US 11/06/26 C81 -0.68%
2ARKK US 11/20/26 P85.01 FLX -7.39%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly OARK YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF · Synthetic covered call on ARKK, paying weekly
Issuer Innovator YieldMax
Strategy defined income synthetic covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK)
Pays quarterly weekly
Payout rate, annualized 6.5% 31.8%
Expense ratio 0.79% 1.00%
Cash paid, 1 year 4.8% 33.3%
Price change, 1 year 0.0% −36.6%
Total return, 1 year +4.9% −2.6%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% −3.7%
Ahead or behind −9.9 pts +1.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 51% not published
Age 3.3 years 3.9 years
Net assets, JULH as of Nov 4, 2026 and OARK as of Nov 3, 2026 $18m $38m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: JULH vs OARK: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowJULHOARKJULHOARKJULHOARK
3 months+1.4%+1.6%1.6%8.3%+1.5 pts−3.9 pts
6 months+3.2%−2.3%2.7%17.8%−1.8 pts−3.3 pts
1 year+4.9%−2.6%4.8%33.3%−9.9 pts+1.1 pts
3 years+20.9%+62.6%18.4%95.8%−62.0 pts−36.1 pts
Since launchNot the same days: JULH Jul 2023 · OARK Nov 2022+23.7%+47.8%20.3%90.4%−56.1 pts−75.3 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

JULH and OARK flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
JULH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 51% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

OARK

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OARK paid 33.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 36.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −2.6%. ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) returned −3.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.1 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 31.8%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JULH or OARK?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting price in cash and OARK paid 33.3%, so OARK paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JULH or OARK?
With every distribution reinvested, JULH returned +4.9% and OARK −2.6% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, JULH or OARK?
JULH charges 0.79% a year and OARK charges 1.00%, so JULH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
JULH vs YSPCJULH vs KYLDJULH vs QVOLJULH vs VAIEOARK vs SPUTOARK vs SCLZOARK vs OCTHOARK vs QUSA
Where to next
S&P 500 (SPY) →ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) →JULH on its own →OARK on its own →JULH dividend history →OARK dividend history →OARK holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
JULH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
JULH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
JULH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
Innovator page for JULH ↗
OARK filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
OARK prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
OARK 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
YieldMax page for OARK ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JULH against OARK, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-oark

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.