Which paid more, DYLG or SCLZ?

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DYLG paid 9.2% of its starting price in cash and SCLZ paid 8.5%, so DYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or SCLZ?

With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +14.8% and SCLZ +10.6% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.

Which is cheaper, DYLG or SCLZ?

DYLG charges 0.35% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

Income ETFs

DYLG vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DYLG paid 9.2% of its price in cash against SCLZ’s 8.5%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DYLG and SCLZ

Net assets: $4.8m on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF, and $20m on Jun 30, 2026 for Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF.

DYLG on its own →SCLZ on its own →

At a glance

9.2%

DYLG cash paid, 1 year

8.5%

SCLZ cash paid, 1 year

+14.8%

DYLG total return, 1 year

+10.6%

SCLZ total return, 1 year

DYLG · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 Not measured

DYLG

+14.8%

none

Not measured

DYLG over 1 year: paid 9.2%, price +4.7%, total +14.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

DYLG

+14.8%

9.2% of it arrived as cash

Total return, distributions reinvested

Not measured

DYLG over 1 year: paid 9.2%, price +4.7%, total +14.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

DYLG

+14.8%

9.2% cash

9.2% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DYLG over 1 year: paid 9.2%, price +4.7%, total +14.8%, not measured against a benchmark. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SCLZ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 4.2 pts behind SPY

SCLZ

+10.6%

SPY

+14.8%

4.2 pts behind SPY

SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.5%, price +1.6%, total +10.6%, SPY +14.8%, −4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

SCLZ

+10.6%

8.5% of it arrived as cash

4.2 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

4.2 pts behind SPY

SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.5%, price +1.6%, total +10.6%, SPY +14.8%, −4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

SCLZ

+10.6%

8.5% cash

4.2 pts behind SPY

8.5% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.8%. SCLZ over 1 year: paid 8.5%, price +1.6%, total +10.6%, SPY +14.8%, −4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.8%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

DYLG costs 0.44 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.2 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DYLG vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Measure	DYLG	SCLZ
Paid and earned
Measure	DYLG	SCLZ
Total return, 1 year	+14.8%	+10.6%
Price change, 1 year	rose 4.7%	rose 1.6%
Return of capital, issuer estimate	32% of the Sep 24, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
Measure	DYLG	SCLZ
Benchmark	not published	S&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Measure	DYLG	SCLZ
Expense ratio	0.35%	0.79%
Net assets, DYLG as of Oct 12, 2026 and SCLZ as of Jun 30, 2026	$4.8m	$20m
Holdings
Measure	DYLG	SCLZ
Holdings in common	31%

Method

What they share

31%

By the books each fund has filed, DYLG and SCLZ hold 31% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

31% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DYLG SCLZ

ALPHABET INC. 4.05% 5.22%

MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.29% 3.74%

APPLE INC. 3.52% 6.20%

AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.09% 3.77%

JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.92% 2.43%

NVIDIA CORPORATION 2.29% 6.03%

VISA INC. 4.17% 2.29%

CATERPILLAR INC. 9.28% 1.86%

THE HOME DEPOT, INC. 3.78% 1.53%

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.32% 3.03%

WALMART INC. 1.27% 1.49%

THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 1.00% 0.88%

Only in one fund ↓

Only in DYLG

THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. 11.60%

UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 4.72%

The Travelers Companies, Inc. 4.26%

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 4.01%

THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY 3.88%

AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY 3.83%

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATION 2.77%

INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION 2.55%

Only in SCLZ

MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 7.95%

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 5.18%

BROADCOM INC 4.74%

ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.88%

JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.53%

META PLATFORMS INC 3.36%

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 3.12%

GE AEROSPACE 2.76%

Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF · Covered call, paying monthly SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF · Dividend stocks with call overlay on SPY, paying monthly

Issuer Global X Swan

Strategy covered call dividend stocks with call overlay

Benchmark none S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays monthly monthly

Payout rate, annualized 4.0% 8.7%

Expense ratio 0.35% 0.79%

Cash paid, 1 year 9.2% 8.5%

Price change, 1 year +4.7% +1.6%

Total return, 1 year +14.8% +10.6%

Benchmark return, 1 year not published +14.8%

Ahead or behind not available −4.2 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 32% not published

Age 3.3 years 2.7 years

Net assets, DYLG as of Oct 12, 2026 and SCLZ as of Jun 30, 2026 $4.8m $20m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: DYLG vs SCLZ: Dividend Yield & Total Return
	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	DYLG	SCLZ	DYLG	SCLZ	DYLG	SCLZ
3 months	−0.1%	0.0%	0.8%	2.1%	not measured	+0.2 pts
6 months	+8.2%	+4.4%	1.8%	4.3%	not measured	−0.6 pts
1 year	+14.8%	+10.6%	9.2%	8.5%	not measured	−4.2 pts
3 years	+53.4%	–	31.6%	–	not measured	–
Since launchNot the same days: DYLG Jul 2023 · SCLZ Feb 2024	+49.0%	+35.4%	31.3%	21.2%	not measured	−20.8 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

About each fund

DYLG

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DYLG paid 9.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.8%. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 32% of the distribution paid Sep 24, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

SCLZ

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.6%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 4.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.7%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DYLG or SCLZ?: Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DYLG paid 9.2% of its starting price in cash and SCLZ paid 8.5%, so DYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or SCLZ?: With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +14.8% and SCLZ +10.6% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, DYLG or SCLZ?: DYLG charges 0.35% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so DYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DYLG vs QUSA DYLG vs JULH DYLG vs SPUT DYLG vs OCTH SCLZ vs XVSP SCLZ vs LJUL SCLZ vs FDND SCLZ vs KIQQ

Where to next

S&P 500 (SPY) →All income ETFs ranked by the Distribution Coverage Score →How the scores are computed →DYLG on its own →SCLZ on its own →DYLG dividend history →DYLG holdings →SCLZ dividend history →SCLZ holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DYLG filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DYLG prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

DYLG 19a-1 distribution notice ↗

Global X page for DYLG ↗

SCLZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

SCLZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Swan website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DYLG against SCLZ, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dylg-vs-sclz

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.