Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

FDND vs SCLZ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year SCLZ paid 8.4% of its price in cash against FDND’s 7.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF and Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF.

7.1%FDND cash paid, 1 year
8.4%SCLZ cash paid, 1 year
−0.6%FDND total return, 1 year
+13.2%SCLZ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SCLZ scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

FDND 21.4SCLZ 43.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

FDND14.1 pts behind DIA · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
DIA+13.5%FDND−0.6%14.1 pts behind DIATotal return, distributions reinvestedDIA+13.5%FDND−0.6%14.1 pts behind DIA
SCLZ14 pts behind SCHD · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SCHD+27.2%SCLZ+13.2%8.4% of it arrived as cash14 pts behind SCHDTotal return, distributions reinvestedSCHD+27.2%SCLZ+13.2%14 pts behind SCHD

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDND and SCLZ hold 16% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions FDND and SCLZ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingFDNDSCLZ
Alphabet Inc. (Class A)5.82%5.18%
Amazon.com, Inc.9.98%3.75%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A)10.12%3.34%
Cisco Systems, Inc.8.66%3.01%
Netflix, Inc.5.90%0.99%
Only in each
Only in FDNDOnly in SCLZ
Alphabet Inc. (Class C) 4.65%MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 7.89%
Arista Networks, Inc. 4.62%APPLE INC 6.15%
Salesforce, Inc. 4.36%NVIDIA CORP 5.99%
Booking Holdings Inc. 4.28%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 5.14%
Oracle Corporation 4.08%BROADCOM INC 4.71%
Snowflake Inc. (Class A) 3.90%ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.86%
Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A) 3.53%MICROSOFT CORP 3.71%
Datadog, Inc. (Class A) 2.62%JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

FDND and SCLZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
FDNDSCLZFDNDSCLZFDNDSCLZ
3 months+8.9%+2.9%2.0%2.1%+8.5 pts−3.6 pts
6 months+18.8%+14.2%4.3%3.8%+4.8 pts+1.6 pts
1 year−0.6%+13.2%7.1%8.4%−14.1 pts−14.0 pts
Since launch+34.3%+36.5%20.4%19.6%−0.5 pts−6.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
FDND and SCLZ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FDND
FT Vest Dow Jones Internet & Target Income ETF
Option income on DIA, paying monthly
SCLZ
Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly
IssuerFirst TrustSwan
Strategyoption incomedividend stocks with call overlay
BenchmarkDow Jones Industrial Average (DIA)US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized7.8%8.5%
Expense ratio0.75%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year7.1%8.4%
Price change, 1 year−8.2%+4.1%
Total return, 1 year−0.6%+13.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year+13.5%+27.2%
Ahead or behind−14.1 pts−14.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age911 days934 days
Net assets$10m$20m

FDND in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −0.6%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly.

SCLZ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FDND or SCLZ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FDND paid 7.1% of its starting price in cash and SCLZ paid 8.4%, so SCLZ paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FDND or SCLZ?
With every distribution reinvested, FDND returned −0.6% and SCLZ returned +13.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so SCLZ returned more.
Which is cheaper, FDND or SCLZ?
FDND charges 0.75% a year and SCLZ charges 0.79%, so FDND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

FDND against SCLZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, FDND against SCLZ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/fdnd-vs-sclz Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources